Question 1:
May I request a PDF copy of the F-PACE DOE FOA? I am unable to download the DOC copy without corruption of the intended content/formatting.
Answer 1:
1. A PDF version of the Foundational Program to Advance Cell Efficiency (F-PACE) Funding Opportunity Announcement is now posted under "FOA Documents" on the Exchange website. Please visit https://eere-exchange.energy.gov/default.aspx.
Question 2:
Our organization anticipates the submission of multiple proposals in response the latest 4 solar technology solicitations from EERE.
Your instructions were as follows: “It is recommended that each organization or business unit, whether acting as a team or single entity, utilize one account as the appropriate contact information for each submission.”
So, should each PI register and submit his or her application individually or should the organization submit all applications from all its PIs under or thru one account registration?
Answer 2:
2. If an organization (such as an FFRDC or a University) intends to submit multiple distinct proposals, it is recommended that the organization create one account registration in cases where the organization has a central grants contact person (such as a Sponsored Programs Office at a University). The Exchange system assigns a distinct control number to each proposal, so each proposal submission will be reviewed independently.
If the organization does not have a central grants contact person, it is recommended that each Principal Investigator registers and submits his/her proposal separately.
Question 3:
We are a global company whose headquarters are in Europe. We have laboratories throughout the world. In the US we have several manufacturing sites and significant operations. Is it correct that 90% of the funding must be spent in the US for us to get an award?
Answer 3:
3. Please refer to Section III.A., Eligible Applicants, in the FOA. Foreign entities, such as your company, may be eligible as the Prime Recipient for an award under this FOA if your company has (1) a place of business in the United States or its Territories AND (2) can demonstrate that your company's use of DOE funds will be in the economic interests of the United States (including, for example; creation of domestic manufacturing capability; use of American products, materials or labor; payment of United States taxes; or United States technological advancements). There is no pre-determined amount of funds that you must spend in the U.S. if you meet these eligibility criteria.
Entities that do not meet this eligibility criteria are not eligible to apply as the prime applicant. However, entities not meeting this criteria are allowed as subrecipients to an eligible applicant provided that, in aggregate, not more than 20% of the total estimated federal funding is provided to entities that do not meet the eligibility criteria.
Question 4:
For the F-PACE FOA, section C.2 indicates a 4 page limit for the concept paper including the cover page, but I can’t find a description of what is required on the cover page. What is required on the cover page for the concept paper? Is it the same as for the full application cover page described in D.3.i?
Answer 4:
4. Yes. The cover page for the concept paper should include the following: name and type of organization, the announcement number, the project title, and both the technical and business points of contact for the applicant, denoting the names, titles, addresses, telephone and facsimile numbers, and electronic mail addresses. The cover page should also identify the names for all other participants (subrecipients). Finally, the cover page must specify which topic the applicant is applying to.
Question 5:
We are confused as to whether one can submit proposals related to OTHER materials which may be at a very preliminary stage compared to CdTe, CIGS, Thin film Si. Clearly, organic solar cell materials and devices are in this category. They are mostly at TRL 2, 3 and 4 but not at 10% efficiency and it is very difficult to estimate what their LCOE will be or what the eventual efficiency will be. All material and device systems improve over time and one expects that the organic materials can also be at 20%+ in the future. Concepts such as tandem organic cells are already being discussed in the literature to increase the efficiency. When CIGS and CdTe started out, they were certainly not at 10% level and yet DOE supported research on them for 20+ years. Will proposals that address fundamental research in such materials and devices at TRL 2, 3 or 4 be considered responsive to the F-PACE solicitation under Topics 1 and 3, or will they be ruled out as not meeting the criteria?
Answer 5:
5. The F-PACE program is not intended to be encompassing of all PV technologies. It is specifically focused on taking currently mature, recently-commercialized, or near-commercial module technologies, located at the end of this pipeline, and improving them with new cell or sub-cell technology R&D occurring at the beginning of this pipeline.
For all topics, the minimum entrance criteria is a module technology that meets the definition of recently commercialized or near commercial. For Topic 1, proposed research must be at a initial TRL of 3 or 4. This topic does not have a minimum efficiency metric for entrance, but applicants must demonstrate that the technology will be advanced at least one TRL by the end of the project. For Topic 2, it is correct that the minimum entrance criteria is a cell or device functioning at greater than 10% efficiency and an initial TRL of 4. For Topic 3, the entrance criteria for topics 1 and 2 apply.
Question 6:
Is there a limit to how many proposals a PI can be on under F-PACE? There is a limit under NextGEN, but we did not see one under F-PACE.
Answer 6:
6. No, there is no limit on the number of applications that can be submitted by a PI.
Question 7:
I am doing research into improving the efficiency of organic photovoltaic solar cells and was wondering if my research might be funded under this program. Is there a contact person I can call and have a conversation with to see if my research might be funded by this program?
Answer 7:
7. Unfortunately, the F-PACE program is competitive and discussions with DOE regarding prospective applications, while the announcement is open, are prohibited. DOE cannot predetermine the suitability or viability of proposed research in advance of the merit review process. It is up to prospective applicants to review the requirements of the FOA and assess the merits of their proposed project to determine whether or not to apply.
The F-PACE program is not intended to be encompassing of all PV technologies. It is specifically focused on taking currently mature, recently-commercialized, or near-commercial module technologies, located at the end of this pipeline, and improving them with new cell or sub-cell technology R&D occurring at the beginning of this pipeline.
For all topics, the minimum entrance criteria is a module technology that meets the definition of recently commercialized or near commercial. For Topic 1, proposed research must be at a initial TRL of 3 or 4. This topic does not have a minimum efficiency metric for entrance, but applicants must demonstrate that the technology will be advanced at least one TRL by the end of the project. For Topic 2, the minimum entrance criteria is a cell or device functioning at greater than 10% efficiency and an initial TRL of 4. For Topic 3, the entrance criteria for topics 1 and 2 apply.
Question 8:
When I try to pull up these full announcements, I get linked to DE-FOA-0000493. Is there another place to get the announcements?
Answer 8:
8. There are multiple Funding Opportunity Announcements listed on the EERE eXCHANGE website (http://eere.energy.gov/financing/exchange). Please scroll down to view all funding opportunities available on eXCHANGE.
Question 9:
Can the concept paper narrative start on the cover page, or must it begin on the second page?
Answer 9:
9. The Cover Page should be a stand-alone page that includes the same information as described in Section IV.D.3i of the FOA. The narrative must start on page 2.
Question 10:
On page 19 of the FOA, it states that SF-424 must be filled out for the complete project period. Is it intended that for the concept paper we fill out all nine year-by-year sheets for the three years as well as the cumulative? Or is it sufficient either to fill out only the cumulative (which is less detailed) or perhaps only the three sheets for one year but with the numbers representing all three years?
Answer 10:
10. Page 19 of the FOA requests the SF-424 Application for Federal Assistance, which is a 6 page word document. The SF-424R&R is a different form, and is not required for the Concept Paper stage. On the SF-424 Application for Financial Assistance, enter the dollar amounts requested on page 3, question 18 for the complete project period (not just the first year, first phase or other subset of the project period).
Question 11:
I have a question on the F-PACE solicitation. It says something like this component "may" allow international participation. My question is: will DOE allow for an international co-PI (including expenditure of US funds outside the US)? The prospects for success of the program will be enhanced by having full buy-in by all participants.
Answer 11:
11. Please refer to the description of Topic 3: Barrier Focus Teams, which begins on page 11 of the FOA. International PIs may be a part of a synergistic team of 3-5 PIs. However, the eligibility requirements in section 3.A of the FOA still apply. If applying as a consortium, one member of the consortium that is an established legal U.S entity must be designated as the lead applicant. International organizations must be designated as subrecipients. In aggregate, not more than 20% of the total estimated DOE and NSF funding can be provided to entities that do not meet the eligibility criteria and those entities must provide at least 20% cost sharing of their portion of the total project cost.
Question 12:
In Section I, page 11, of the F-PACE FOA (DE-FOA-0000492), it is stated that “applications submitted to Topic 2 must… provide an entrance baseline and an exit deliverable, including but not limited [to] a cell or device functioning at >10% efficiency (AM1.5), on which the performance metrics (including but not limited to efficiency) will be measured and independently verified by a 3rd party.” However, elsewhere in the FOA (e.g. Section V, page 30, Criterion 6 for concept paper review), the requirement for independent 3rd party verification of the >10% efficiency entrance criterion is not specified. Do applicants need to have their >10% efficient baseline solar cell measured at an independent 3rd party, or are measurements done on applicants’ equipment sufficient to meet the program’s entrance criterion?
Answer 12:
12. Third-party certification of performance for the entrance baseline is not required at the time of application to this FOA. However, if third-party measurement of the entrance cell is not available, then supporting data should be included in the application that supports the assertion that the entrance cell performance is >10% cell; additionally, the project management plan should include third-party certification of the entrance cell as the first milestone.
Question 13:
I could not locate the information on how many pre-applications are allowed as PI and Co-PI.
Answer 13:
13. There is no limit on how many pre-applications are allowed per Principal Investigator (PI) or Co-Principal (Co-PI). Please see Section I FOA Description, Special Requirements on pages 12-13, which states:
-
Entities that apply for multiple awards must demonstrate that all work for each application can be completed as a standalone effort. There must be a single prime recipient identified in each application.
-
Applicants must indicate the Topic to which they are applying in their full application narrative. Applicants may submit applications to multiple Topics; however, separate applications must be submitted for each Topic. If your organization is submitting more than one Application to different topic areas, you must identify an application number and the Topic Area Number at the end of each file name (e.g., Company-1-Topic1).
-
Topic 3 only: The Barrier Focus Team must consist of at least 3-5 PIs from at least 2 institutions, and at least one of the PIs must have PV cell expertise. “Institutions” can be separate universities, companies, or national labs. Different departments or divisions within a university, company, or national lab are not considered different institutions.
Question 14:
We are interested in submitting to the F-PACE-FOA-0000492 solicitation under Topic 1. Are organic photovoltaic materials also of interest in this solicitation or are you only interested in inorganic?
Answer 14:
14. For all topics, the minimum entrance criteria is a module technology that meets the definition of recently commercialized or near commercial. For Topic 1, proposed research must be at a initial TRL of 3 or 4. This topic does not have a minimum efficiency metric for entrance, but applicants must demonstrate that the technology will be advanced at least one TRL by the end of the project. Any technology, organic or inorganic, that meets this criteria is eligible.
Question 15:
For DE-FOA-0000492 “F-PACE” is an FFRDC authorization letter required as part of the Concept Paper?
Answer 15:
15. No, the FFRDC authorization letter is only required as a component of the Project Narrative in the Final Full Application. Please refer to section IV.D.3.vi of the FOA for further information.
Question 16:
Is there a naming convention required for the concept paper documents? The SF424, and the concept paper.
Answer 16:
16. For the Concept Paper documents, please follow a similar naming convention as to what is outlined in section IV.D of the FOA:
Question 17:
I am filling out an Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 for the F-PACE funding opportunity. I have the following questions:
What is the CFDA Title for this opportunity?
Could you please define the Federal Entity Identifier?
Could you please define what the Competition Identification Number is for this opportunity?
Answer 17:
17. CFDA Number: 81.087
CFDA Title: Renewable Energy Research and Development
Federal Entity Identifier: Enter the control number listed on the "General" tab of your application in Exchange
Competition Identification Number: Leave this field blank
Question 20:
DOE is looking for the following information to be included in applications under Topic 3 of this FOA (at p.12):
1. Identify performance metrics that define the critical parameters relevant to the success of the project, and identify target values for these metrics.
2. Specify physical specimens that will provide an entrance baseline and an exit deliverable, on which the performance metrics will be measured and independently verified by a third party.
3. Describe how the targeted improvements in the performance metric are connected to a reduction in the cost per watt or Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) compared to the state-of-the-art in a PV device.
Does this information need to be included in the Concept Paper as well?
Answer 20:
20. As noted in Section IV.C.2 of the FOA, the Concept Paper should provide a clear, concise statement of the specific objectives, primary approaches, and expected outcomes and impacts of the proposed project. It should address each of the Merit Review Criteria for Concept Papers listed in Section V.A.2 for the Topic under which the applicant is proposing a project. It must provide sufficient information that reviewers will be able to evaluate the technical merits of the preliminary application in accordance with these merit review criteria. The justification for the proposed project should include a clear statement of the importance of the project in terms of the utility of the outcomes and the target community of beneficiaries. For multi-organizational or multi-investigator projects, briefly describe the roles and the work to be performed by each participant/investigator.
Question 21:
If my organization chooses to use one registered user who is authorized to submit on behalf of the organization (such as a sponsored programs office in a university), how do I assign permissions to individual Principal Investigators?
Answer 21:
21. The organization's registered user will be the primary user for the organization who will apply to funding opportunities by completing an initial information sheet for each submission and click the create Concept Paper button. The system will then generate a control number for the submissions and move it to the primary applicant's My Submissions section. From there the primary applicant will click on My Submissions, then click on the control number for the submission. The primary applicant will then click on the share button at the bottom of the screen. To share permissions the primary applicant will insert the email address of a registered EERE Exchange user. Once permissions are granted the other EERE users will be able to begin updating the submission data in EERE Exchange.
Question 22:
Our organization will be submitting a concept paper for DE-FOA-0000492 and based on the information in the solicitation, it appears that our organization is eligible for the cost share waiver (we are a 501(c)(3) nonprofit). Are we required to formally request a cost share waiver? Or is the cost share waiver automatic based on our type of organization?
Answer 22:
22. As stated in section III.B of the FOA, the cost share waiver is only available for Topic 1 applications from Non-profit organizations (as defined in 10 CFR 600.3), Institutions of Higher Education, U.S. National Laboratories, or U.S. Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDC). The cost share waiver is automatic, based on the type of organization applying under Topic 1.
Cost sharing above the minimum required and the likelihood of technology to be commercialized as evidenced by industry participation and/or industry cost share may be considered during selection (see Section V.A.3).
Question 23:
Are federal agencies eligible to submit an application to this Funding Opportunity Announcement as the prime applicant?
Answer 23:
23. If the federal agency has its own statutory authority to apply for other federal awards, it would be eligible. To establish such eligibility to apply for funding under this announcement, a cognizant Contracting Officer from the agency should provide a written verification letter along with its application materials.
The following wording is acceptable for the verification letter:
“In consultation with legal counsel for the _____________ [federal agency], I have verified that this agency does have the statutory authority to apply for funding under this DOE funding opportunity announcement [insert FOA #] and to participate in the performance of the proposed project. The work proposed for this agency is consistent with or complementary to the missions of the agency, authorized by the following statute ________________.”
Question 24:
Is the SF-424 – Application for Federal Assistance the only required form with the submission of an Institution concept paper?
Answer 24:
24. As stated in section IV.C of the FOA, there are two documents required to be uploaded to in the Concept Paper application:
- SF-424 Application for Federal Assistance
- Concept Paper Narrative
Question 25:
The submission site for the concept application requires an abstract be entered which is the same as the full application abstract. Since no one has been selected for a full application what are you requiring be entered in that section?
Answer 25:
25. As stated in section IV.C of the FOA, the application process includes two phases: a concept paper application phase and a full application phase. Following completion of the concept paper phase, applicants will be notified as to whether or not they are encouraged to submit a full application. If you are encouraged to submit a full application, please follow the Exchange instructions regarding the abstract. Applicants may use a brief (one or two sentence) description of the proposed project in the abstract field required by the EERE Exchange online form.
Question 26:
I am working on a Concept Paper for submission. As I understand, the submittal is limited to three pages. Does this CONCEPT PAPER include a budget estimate? How can I introduce the Bio’s of the team members?
Answer 26:
26. As stated in section IV.C.2 of the FOA, the Concept Paper must not exceed 4 pages, including cover page, charts, graphs, maps, and photographs. It must provide sufficient information that reviewers will be able to evaluate the technical merits of the preliminary application in accordance with the Merit Review Criteria for Concept Papers listed in Section V.A.2 of the FOA. See section IV.C.2 for full details on the Concept Paper requirements.
It is not necessary to include a budget in the Concept Paper, unless it significantly contributes to the reviewers' ability to evaluate the technical merits of the proposed project. The budget estimate is entered on the "Funds and Costs" tab of your application in Exchange. On this tab, you are asked to enter both the Federal share and the non-Federal share of project costs. The full budget should be provided in the Full Application (see section IV.D.5-8 of the FOA).
As stated in section IV.C.2 of the FOA, projects with multiple organizations or multiple investigators must briefly describe in the Concept Paper the roles and the work to be performed by each participant/investigator. The full bio and resume should be provided in the Full Application (see section IV.D.3 of the FOA).
Question 27:
We are putting together a team for a solution to DE-FOA-0000492, Topic 3. Our company has experts in the US and some very unique expertise in our European office. The Topic suggests, “They also could potentially leverage international collaborations.” Is it preferable to the DOE to list both a PI in the US headquarters AND a PI in the European office, or just a PI in the US?
Answer 27:
27. DOE has no preference with regard to a single PI or multiple PIs. For a discussion of international collaboration, please see the Eligibility Requirements in section III of the FOA. The applicant, whether a single organization or team/partnership/consortium, must indicate if the project will include multiple PIs. The decision to use multiple PIs for a project is the sole responsibility of the applicant. If multiple PIs will be designated, the application must identify the Contact PI/Project Coordinator and provide a “Coordination and Management Plan” that describes the organization structure of the project as it pertains to the designation of multiple PIs. This plan should, at a minimum, include:
- Process for making decisions on scientific/technical direction;
- Publications;
- Intellectual property issues;
- Communication plans;
- Procedures for resolving conflicts; and
- PIs’ roles and administrative, technical and scientific responsibilities for the project
An amendment to the FOA to incorporate this language will be posted on May 10, 2011, after the Concept Paper closing date.
Question 37:
We submitted two pre-proposals: for DE-FOA-0000387 and DE-FOA-0000492 and received two responses: one pre-proposal was "Encouraged" and response summary is more generic and the other one was "Invited" and the response summary is more specific. Would you please explain the difference between "Encouraged" and "Invited" if any?
Answer 37:
37. For FOA DE-FOA-0000387, the two possible responses were "Invited" or "Not Invited". The pre-application was a down-select mechanism, therefore only applicants with "Invited" pre-applications are allowed to submit a full application.
For FOA DE-FOA-0000492, the two possible responses were "Encouraged" or "Discouraged". In this case, there was not a down-select, and therefore there is no restriction against "Discouraged" concept paper applicants submitting full applications.
Question 39:
We have been invited to submit a full proposal. One of our subs is a FFRDC. My understanding is that an FFRDC’s costs are not segregated into funded and shared; that is, all of their incurred costs are reimbursed by DOE. Are all of their costs combined with all costs of the lead and any other subs, when calculating the amount the entire team is required to cost share?
Answer 39:
39. Except under Topic 1 of this FOA, the applicant’s cost share requirement will be based on the total cost of the project, including the applicant’s and the FFRDC contractor’s portions of the effort. The applicant, if successful, will be the responsible authority regarding the settlement and satisfaction of all contractual and administrative issues, including but not limited to, disputes and claims arising out of any agreement between the applicant and the FFRDC contractor.
FFRDC funding should be included in the budget submitted in response to this FOA. In the event an applicant is selected for negotiation of an award, the value of, and funding for, the FFRDC contractor portion of the work will not normally be included in the award to a successful applicant. Usually, DOE will fund a DOE FFRDC contractor through the DOE field work proposal system and other FFRDC contractors through an interagency agreement with the sponsoring agency.
Question 41:
The posted status advises us to review “any available comments” before submitting a full application. Where can we find such comments?
Answer 41:
41. After logging in to Exchange, complete the following steps to view comments:
Click on "My Submissions"
Click on the Control Number of your application
Scroll down to "Concept Paper Response" to view comments.
Please review the Applicant User Guide at https://eere-exchange.energy.gov/Manuals.aspx for additional information.
Question 47:
I have just recently come across the FOA for the F-PACE application and believe that my application is highly suitable for this particular funding opportunity. Having just recently discovered this FOA however, I was not aware of the Concept Paper Submission Deadline until after it had already passed. I was writing to inquire if it is still possible to submit my application even after missing the initial deadline. If you would be able to allow me to submit my Concept Paper within the next few days and permit me to then hand in my final application by June 30th, it would be highly appreciated. If it isn't possible to enter my application into this FOA, would you know of any other Funding Opportunities available that fit the same criteria as this one.
Answer 47:
47. Unfortunately, only Applicants who submitted Concept Paper Applications by the due date and whose Concept Paper Applications were deemed compliant will be allowed to submit a Full Application.
Please visit www.grants.gov to search for additional grant opportunities.
Question 51:
We are the lead on a proposal we are submitting for DE-FOA-0000492, Topic 3. We have both non-FFRDC and FFRDC team members. When we cost the project, we will include all members’ costs. Because FFRDCs do not cost share, when calculating the cost sharing required on the project, should this include FFRDC costs, or do we exclude FFRDC costs when calculating the cost share needed?
Also, we understand that DOE normally funds the FFRDC directly, but the lead (applicant) is responsible for all contractual and administrative issues. Because the lead has this responsibility, may the lead apply it’s normal G/A indirect rate on the FFRDC’s funded costs?
Answer 51:
51. Yes, include FFRDC costs when calculating the cost sharing required on the project (please reference Question 39, which states: "the applicant’s cost share requirement will be based on the total cost of the project, including the applicant’s and the FFRDC contractor’s portions of the effort").
Without delving into the specifics of your particular indirect rate agreement, DOE cannot comment on whether it is acceptable for the lead to apply its normal G&A indirect rate on the FFRDC's funded costs. If your proposal is selected for award, individual rate questions will be resolved during the negotiation process.
Question 53:
If a national laboratory is the lead on the proposal partnering with industry or university, would the partnering funds flow directly from DOE to the partner, or would the funds flow to the national laboratory to be sent out by the laboratory to the partner as subcontract funds?
Answer 53:
53. If a national laboratory is the lead on the proposal partnering with industry or university, the funds flow to the national laboratory to be sent out by the laboratory to the partner as subcontract funds. Please see Section III.C of the FOA, which states:
"Please be advised that those entities that form teams with National Laboratories in which the Laboratory is a Prime Recipient (i.e., lead participant) will be required to enter into subcontracts with the Laboratory. As such, the terms and conditions of the Management and Operating contract between the Laboratory and the Department of Energy will be in effect for any subcontracts, and not the traditional provisions associated with a financial assistance award. National Laboratories acting as Prime Recipients must make all applicable terms and conditions available to their subcontractors prior to submission of their applications. Any entities considering such teaming arrangements should request the Laboratory to provide the applicable terms and conditions prior to the Prime Recipient submitting a response to this FOA."
Question 54:
My question is regarding which SF 424R&R form is to be used for the F-PACE full application. The text in paragraph 5 of Section IV of the FOA states that we ‘use the SF 424R&R Excel, "Budget Information Non-Construction Programs" form’, found on the Energy.gov website. The EERE website has a list of Application Documents under DE-FOA-0000492, which shows a different SF 424R&R form. There is yet another (3-year fillable) SF 424 R&R found on the Energy.gov website. Please advise which is the right one.
Also, please confirm if the due date has been moved to June 30 instead of June 23, 2011.
Answer 54:
54. Section IV.D of the FOA states that applicants should use the application documents found at http://eere.energy.gov/financing/exchange, (NOT the Energy.gov website). Please use the SF-424 Research and Related Budget (SF 424R&R) listed under FOA 492's "Required Application Documents" section. This is an excel document. The document found below it in the "Required Application Documents" section is a word document titled "SF-424 R&R Instructions". Please consult this word document for guidance on how to fill out the SF-424 R&R excel document, as well as further instructions for providing a budget justification to support the SF-424 R&R. Both a SF-424 R&R Budget and a Budget Justification must be provided in the Full Application. Please consult Section IV.D of the FOA for additional information on application requirements.
The FOA 492 due date has been moved to June 30th, 2011 at 11:59 pm Eastern Time.
Question 55:
If one submitted a Concept Paper for Topic 2 and was thereafter invited to submit a Full Application, may one re-focus its Full Application to Topic 1 and/or Topic 3 (rather than Topic 2), or is one restricted to only submit the Full Application against Topic 2?
Answer 55:
55. Unless there was an error in the initial Topic designation, the full application must be submitted under same Topic to which the Concept Paper was submitted.
Question 57:
In the merit review criteria in the FOA it says “Criterion 1: Foundational Scientific Advancement Toward $0.50 per watt Module Goal” and “1.2.1 Extent to which the proposed research is critically required for advancing the state of the art to meet $0.50 per watt modules in the targeted technology, including a convincing pathway for enabling commercial and near commercial semiconductor-based PV systems with module costs of $0.50 per watt, …” We interpret these statements as the proposed research needs to provide critical advancement to the $0.50/W module target, but the proposed research itself does not necessarily reach the $0.50/W module target. Is our interpretation correct?
Answer 57:
57. The objective of The Solar Energy Technologies Program is to successfully achieve all of the goals of the SunShot Initiative by the end of the decade (see: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/sunshot/).
Criterion 1 places a key scoring criterion on the achievement of the specific SunShot goal of $0.50/modules by 2020. Since this is a three year award we recognize that $0.50/W may not be achieved by the completion of an award, however, a clear and definitive pathway to achieving $0.50/W modules must be included in the full application. A successful applicant is expected to be able to clearly articulate and quantify the expected benefit of the work they are proposing. We expect an analysis detailing where the applicant believes costs to be today, how they believe cost will be reduced, where cost will be at the completion of this work, and the technical pathway the proposed technology will take to achieve $0.50/W modules by 2020. An application which does not clearly define a technical pathway to achieving $0.50/W modules by 2020 will not score well on Criterion 1.
Question 63:
Thank you for your time in reviewing this question regarding cost-share.
I have a calculation for the cost of our lab and came up with a per person annual amount.
For my portion of the 20% cost-share, I would like to use a percentage of the lab cost as that cost share. The other 80% of the lab would be charged to the project (federal share). This would be for the individuals who are direct to the project, of course.
The remainder of the lab costs overall are absorbed by the funding that we receive from our parent company for R&D.
Answer 63:
63. It is acceptable to charge a percentage of total direct personnel compensation as cost share. Cost sharing must meet the criteria outlined in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 600 (applicable subpart depends on type of entity). In general, all cost sharing and matching contributions, including cash and third party in-kind, must meet the following the criteria:
-- Are verifiable from the recipient's records;
-- Are not included as contributions for any other federally-assisted project or program;
-- Are necessary and reasonable for proper and efficient accomplishment of project or program objectives;
-- Are allowable under the applicable cost principles;
-- Are not paid by the Federal Government under another award, except where authorized by Federal statue to be used as cost sharing or matching;
-- Are provided for in the approved budget; and
-- Conform to other provisions outlined in the regulations, as applicable.
Cost sharing must be "verifiable from the recipient's records," which means that the recipient must be able to capture in their accounting system records that cost sharing was spent for the project.
Question 64:
I have three questions regarding the F-PACE application we are working on.
• First, we are considering changing the principle investigator, from myself to another researcher at the company. Is it OK if the PI on our full proposal is not the same as the PI in our concept paper?
• Second, we are considering revising the technology plan which was outlined in the concept paper. Is it OK if the tasks and timelines in the full application do not completely match what was described in the concept paper?
• Third, are you able to give me any indication as to the concept paper success rate—that is, the percentage of applicants who submitted concept papers who were encouraged to submit full applications in response?
Answer 64:
64. Yes, it is okay if the PI on the full proposal is not the same as the PI in the concept paper
Second, applicants are not bound to the tasks and timelines described in the concept paper and may modify these, as appropriate, in the full application.
Third, please refer to Question 40. We will not be releasing information on total number of concept papers submitted for F-PACE, nor the number encouraged to submit full applications
Question 73:
I seem to be having a problem with the SF 424 R&R form. I downloaded it directly from the “Required Application Documents” section. This Excel document I believe it may be corrupt. When I enter in the senior/key person information for all required personnel and include the non federal portion for each person I am able to do this. However, I noticed that at the bottom of part of the document where it shows the Totals it does not calculate the non-federal correctly it only shows the non-fed for the first person only. How can I get an working excel form?
Answer 73:
73. You are correct, there is an error in the formula in cell AL97 of tab “Budget 1 A”. To repair the formula, complete the following:
1. Click on “Review” in the Excel menu bar
2. Click on “Unprotect Sheet” (there is no password).
3. Paste the following into cell AL97: “=SUM(AL19,AL28,AL37,AL46,AL66,AL75,AL84,AL93,AL95)”
Once you unprotect the worksheet, you will be able to correct any additional formula errors.
Question 77:
I am putting together a full application in response to the solicitation number DE-FOA-0000492, Foundational Program to Advance Cell Efficiency (F-PACE). One of the collaborating institutions in the project is [name removed] in [European City]. Since they are a non-profit organization, do they need to do the cost-share. We are submitting to Topic 1.
Answer 77:
77. The Topic 1 cost share waiver does not apply to entities that do not meet the eligibility criteria in Section III.A of the FOA. If the foreign collaborator on your project does not have a place of business in the United States or its Territories, the foreign collaborator must provide at least 20% cost sharing of their portion of the total project cost.
Question 78:
Is there a way to allow the subawardees to submit their budgets and budget justifications in a manner that would be private to them? Since they are suppliers to us, they have some desire to keep their specific costs private. We would know their aggregate budget amount so we can include them in the Subawardee portion of our prime recipient SF424 for the overall project.
Answer 78:
78. Prime Applicants and Subrecipients have two options. Applicants can sign confidentiality agreements with Subcontractors/Team Members, stating they will maintain the confidential information (i.e. salary and indirect rate information) in a confidential manner, and only share the information with the Department of Energy.
The second option is that the subcontractors can submit this information directly to the question mailbox for each FOA, if necessary. However, we will need a letter from the Prime Applicant to give the Subcontractor permission to submit the information separately and give the Department of Energy permission to speak to the subcontractor directly should we have any questions.
Question 79:
Our organization is eligible for a waiver of cost share requirements. When the application is submitted it is necessary to include some sort of a waiver form?
Answer 79:
79. No. An entity's registration with the Central Contractor Registry (CCR) will generally demonstrate if the applicant is an eligible entity for the cost-share waiver. DOE reserves the right to request additional documentation, if necessary.
Please note that CCR registration is not required to submit an application, however, Applicants that do not have this requirement in place prior to September 1, 2011 may not receive an award under the announcement.
Question 80:
I have three issues with forms that are required for submission of full proposals in response to FOA0000492.
(1) Regarding the form for “Prime Recipient SF 424 Research and Related”, the instructions clearly say: “Use the SF 424R&R Excel, "Budget Information Non-Construction Programs" form. As far as I can tell, this form has OMB Approval No. 0348-0044. However, the form provided on line has OMB Number 4040-0001 and is much more detailed. Which form is supposed to be used?
(2) From the instructions, I understand that the budget justification form is an XLS file. Is there a format for this file, or am I supposed to make up my own format? The instructions say: “Further instructions for providing a budget justification to support the SF424R&R can be found at http://eere.energy.gov/financing/Exchange.” However, I can find no information at this web site with further information about preparing a budget justification.
(3) The summary slide template file (.ppt) on the web site appears to be corrupted. I am able to download slide templates from other FOAs, but not FOA0000492. Could you please e-mail me a template or tell me where I can get an uncorrupted file?
Answer 80:
80. (1) Please use the form provided on the Exchange website.
80. (2) Instructions for the budget justification can be found on page 2 of the SF-424R&R Instructions document, also available for download on the Exchange website.
80. (3) We have tested the Summary Slide download, and have not found it to be corrupted. If you still encounter problems, you may use the Summary Slide template from one of the other SunShot FOAs.
Question 83:
I was wondering when the announcement will be made on the awards for:
DE-FOA-0000492: Foundational Program to Advance Cell Efficiency (F-PACE)
Answer 83:
Applicants selected for award under the F-PACE FOA are anticipated to be announced in early September.
Question 84:
Under “Questions and Answers” you write: “the applicant must first register and create an account on the main EERE eXCHANGE site. This account will then allow the user to register for any open EERE FOAs that are currently in eXCHANGE. It is recommended that each organization or business unit, whether acting as a team or a single entity, utilize one account as the appropriate contact information for each submission.”
18. Does this mean we should use the one account as an institution in submitting applications for any of our PIs, or should our PIs each create an account and submit their application material (and concept papers) separately and individually?
19. In either case, should the Business Point of Contact be a representative from our Sponsored Programs office or the Departmental Administrator attached to the office of the PI?
Answer 84:
18. Please scroll up and review Question & Answer #2 on this website.
19. The Business Point of Contact should be the person best equipped to provide documentation regarding the applicant organization's administrative / financial matters, such as: Cognizant Federal Agency, indirect rates, recent audits, accounting system compliance, preferred payment method / information (ASAP routing number), etc. It is recommended that this person have access to FedConnect, so as to be able to retrieve and sign official award documents. At a university, a representative from the Sponsored Programs Office is generally the best choice for this role.
Question 86:
1. How many awards were made for this particular FOA?
2. How many proposals were received for this FOA?
3. If possible, please share with us a copy of a successful proposal.
Answer 86:
1. Eighteen proposals were selected for negotiation leading to award.
2. Unfortunately, as in Question # 40, which referred to concept paper applications, we will not be releasing information regarding number of full proposals received for this FOA.
3. The successful applications will not be made publicly viewable through any DOE controlled website. The only way to access award proposals is through a Freedom of Information Act Request (FOIA). To learn more about and submit a FOIA request, please visit http://energy.gov/management/office-management/operational-management/freedom-information-act.