{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":2,"sheets":["FOA CONTENT QUESTIONS","Admin Pick List"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":0,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"FOA CONTENT QUESTIONS","index":0,"n_rows":77,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":77,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[1,0,1,4],[0,0,0,4]]}
["ADMINISTRATIVE QUESTION AND ANSWER LOG"]
["DE-FOA-00002605 - Deploying Solar with Wildlife and Ecosystem Service Benefits\n"]
["Question #","Date Submitted","Topic","Question","Answer"]
[1,"2022-03-03","Eligibility","Are we allowed to list our organization for the Teaming Partner List and apply to the FOA as a Prime Recipient?  Can an organization have multiple listings based on type of expertise?","Yes, an organization can be on the Teaming Partner list and also apply to the FOA as a Prime Recipient. It is also common for applications to be from groups that are also partners on different applications. The FOA allows for multiple submissions.  There should only be one listing with all expertise listed."]
[2,"2022-03-04","Eligibility","I am currently collaborating with on existing DOE funded projects, however I am not the PI or CO-PI. Additionally, I am a scientist at a federal agency with a joint appointment as an Assistant Professor in academia. As such, I am assuming that I am an eligible PI either in my capacity as a professor or via my joint appointment. Please let me know if these assumptions are valid.","Please refer to section III, Eligibility Information of the FOA document."]
[3,"2022-03-09","Eligibility","If you are a current subcontract on an existing DOE grant within EERE, can you apply to be a primary recipient, and do you need to propose a completely different project or can you expand on said current project?","Please refer to section III, Eligibility Information of the FOA document."]
[4,"2022-03-09","Eligibility","Are private landowners eligible for this FOA?","Please refer to section III, Eligibility Information of the FOA document."]
[6,"2022-03-06","Concept Paper","We would like to create an Owl Sanctuary combined with a Solar Farm, we would like your thoughts on this.","Please refer to Section I.A, Background and Context, I.B, Topic Areas, and I.C, Applications Specifically Not of Interest of the FOA.  Prior to submission, DOE cannot comment on the eligibility of specific concepts."]
[7,"2022-03-07","Concept Paper","Is providing financial services for projects that take into consideration wildlife and ecosystems something you are interested in?","Please refer to Section I.A, Background and Context, I.B, Topic Areas, and I.C, Applications Specifically Not of Interest of the FOA.  Prior to submission, DOE cannot comment on the eligibility of specific concepts."]
[8,"2022-03-07","Eligibility","The FOA restricts responses to ground-mounted systems, will there be any future calls for floating systems?","Please visit eere-exchange.energy.gov or Grant.gov for additional funding opportunities."]
[9,"2022-03-09","Concept Paper","Can you clarify what is considered “compensatory mitigation options”? Would the development of a voluntary conservation agreement (e.g., Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances or Safe Harbor Agreement) be an eligible activity to promote conservation actions and reduce permitting barriers and timelines? "," Compensatory mitigation is defined in this document as “the restoration, rehabilitation, enhancement, or preservation of other land to “compensate” for land adversely impacted by solar energy installations.” Projects that focus on developing new or validating existing compensatory mitigation options will be deemed nonresponsive and will not be reviewed or considered. Projects may include supplemental activities associated with compensatory mitigation actions, as long as the focus of the project is responsive to one of the two topic areas described in the FOA. "]
[10,"2022-03-10","Concept Paper","Is this FOA interested in social science research that gauges landowner and community preferences regarding ecosystem service benefits from solar? If so, must this social science research be paired with other biophysical science (i.e., quantifying stormwater runoff and management for dual-use systems, assessing the viability of pollinator mixes, etc.) to be competitive? ","“Projects in [topic 2] will improve solar energy siting practices by developing models, tools, or methodologies to characterize, quantify, and/or optimize ecosystem services in solar energy deployment decisions.” As community and landowner preferences are likely to be key inputs into the process of “optimizing” ecosystem services, social science research activities are eligible. Applicants must explain how their proposed activities achieve the goals of Topic 2 as stated in the FOA."]
[11,"2022-03-10","Other","What is considered a single site in the interest of this FOA? It says that projects that focus on a single solar site are not of interest, but it is unclear if this means a single landowner or a single regional area (e.g., multiple fields within a close radius)? Further, must all research activities be carried out on each involved site to be considered multi-site? ","Research results must be scientifically rigorous and generalizable. Therefore, land ownership is not relevant, but a single site (or two sites that are adjacent to each other) may not provide sufficient variation in the data to draw robust scientific conclusions. For additional information please refer to Section V.A. of the FOA “Technical Review Criteria;” specifically, Criterion 1 for the full applications, “Technical Merit, Innovation, and Impact.” There is no requirement that research plans be identical at each site, but some comparison across sites is necessary to satisfy the stated goal of scientific rigor."]
[12,"2022-03-10","Cost Sharing","For FOA 2605, will the cost share requirement be 20% for all projects (including demonstration/Tier 3)?","This FOA is limited to R&D work, which requires 20% Cost Share."]
[13,"2022-03-16","Other","The FOA mentions a 3 year timeline and on slide 19 of the webinar it says 24-48 months. Can we submit a 4 year budget?","This simply refers to the timeline in which research produced ought to be able to be applied, not the timeline for a project length. As stated in Section II.A (pg 21), projects may be up to 48 months (four years) for both topic areas."]
[14,"2022-03-16","Other","Can Grad Student Tuition be charged to this funding opportunity?","Please refer to 2 CFR 200.430(j)."]
[15,"2022-03-18","Concept Paper","Would community carport-mounted PV be in scope?","Please refer to Section I.A, Background and Context, I.B, Topic Areas, and I.C, Applications Specifically Not of Interest of the FOA.  Prior to submission, DOE cannot comment on the eligibility of specific concepts."]
[16,"2022-03-18","Eligibility","Are existing Solar fields eligible for this grant if the funds are being used to enhance biodiversity and create natural habitat?","There is no requirement that research activities for this FOA occur on new construction or as part of the construction process.  Use of an existing site is acceptable as long as the project can achieve the R&D goals outlined in the FOA."]
[17,"2022-03-20","Concept Paper","One of the components of the concept paper is to identify the “proposed technology’s target level of performance”. Can you clarify what that means? Does it mean the target at the end of the project or the target once the technology is fully developed, or something else?","Applicants should identify the level of performance that they believe their technology can meet by the end of the proposed projected timeline."]
[18,"2022-03-20","Concept Paper","Can you provide some examples or document templates for initial concept papers submission? ","Please refer to section Section IV.C.i, Concept Paper Content Requirements, of the FOA.  DOE does not provide examples or templates."]
[19,"2022-03-20","Cost Sharing","In the presentaiton you mentioned 20% Cost Sharing does that mean 80% will be funded by the program and 20% we will pay?","This is correct, applicants are required to contribute 20% Cost Share to the project. Please see Appendix B of the FOA for additional information on cost share. "]
[20,"2022-03-23","Foreign Entities/Work","Can local governments from other countries participate?  ","Please refer to Section III.A.iii, Eligiblity Information, of the FOA."]
[21,"2022-03-23","Other","The Current and Pending Support document is  listed in the text of the FOA, but is not included in the Full Application Content Requirements table.  Can you confirm whether or not this is a requirement of the FOA?","Per section VI.A.xviii of the FOA, the Current and Pending Support is a requirment of the FOA.  If selected for Negotiations, the applicant must submit the information."]
[22,"2022-03-24","Concept Paper","At various points, the FOA refers to both new technologies and new methodologies, but generally focuses more on new technologies. Will existing technology being applied in new ways be eligible? ","Both new technologies and new methodologies are of interest for this FOA. An existing technology being applied in new ways could be of interest if the new application advances the state of the art and achieves the goals of the FOA."]
[23,"2022-03-24","Concept Paper","What is the standard for ‘innovative’? A technology or methodology might be common for certain areas of wildlife management but be new to understanding impacts of renewable energy.","If technology or methodology has not previously been deployed in the deployment of solar energy, then the validation and adaptation of the technology or methodology to achieve the FOA goals constitutes innovation. Innovativeness will be judged on a scale during the evaluation and selection process as described in Sec V."]
[24,"2022-03-24","Concept Paper","Is there any preference for projects that focus on a suite of species rather than a single species?","No such preference is expressed in the FOA, but applicants should refer to the goals articulated in the FOA and the review criteria described in Sec V.A to understand how their project will be evaluated. "]
[25,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Assuming that this presentation will also be posted?","Slides, as well as a recording  of the webinar are posted on EERE Exchange."]
[26,"2022-03-08","Webinar","What is the minimum size of the PV system that can be considered for this funding opportunity?","No minimum size for a PV system is listed in this funding opportunity."]
[27,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Is the produciton of food crops considered an ecosystem service under this FOA?","Yes, however Topic 2 research in which the only ecosystem service under consideration is food production, is not of interest under this FOA. Refer to section I.C, Applications Specifically Not of Interest of the FOA."]
[28,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Are there additional assessment points available if the cost share is higher than 20%?","No, the merit review criteria and program policy factors do not take additional cost share beyond 20% into consideration."]
[29,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Are federal agencies eligible to be prime recipients if they are working with other non-federal entities?","Please refer to section III.A.ii, Eligibility Information of the FOA document. Federal Agencies are not eligible to be prime recipients."]
[30,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Can federal entities be partners?","Please refer to section III.A.ii, Eligibility Information of the FOA document. Federal Agencies are eligible as subrecipients."]
[31,"2022-03-08","Webinar","In Topic 2, is business-model innovation eligible or does it specifically need to be technology innovation?","Please refer to Section I.A, Background and Context, I.B, Topic Areas, and I.C, Applications Specifically Not of Interest of the FOA.  Prior to submission, DOE cannot comment on the eligibility of specific concepts."]
[32,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Can you give an example of a project we can look at that meets the criteria for this grant?","Please refer to Section I.B.i and I.B.ii Areas of Interest. "]
[33,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Will this opportunity be open to UK based asset manager organisations which manage ground-mounted PV systems based in the US?","Please refer to section III.A.iii, Eligibility Information of the FOA document."]
[34,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Is research on stakeholder perceptions on the values of different ecosystem services appropriate for this FOA?","“Projects in [topic 2] will improve solar energy siting practices by developing models, tools, or methodologies to characterize, quantify, and/or optimize ecosystem services in solar energy deployment decisions.” As community and landowner preferences are likely to be key inputs into the process of “optimizing” ecosystem services, social science research activities are eligible. Applicants must explain how their proposed activities achieve the goals of Topic 2 as stated in the FOA."]
[35,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Are there limitations on what the award can be used for (e.g., can't be used for salaries, etc)?","All expenditures must be allowable, allocable, and reasonable in accordance with the applicable federal cost principles. Refer to the following applicable federal cost principles for more information: Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 31 for For-Profit entities; and 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E - Cost Principles for all other non-federal entities."]
[36,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Would topic two allow for ag if food is produced but there's also academic research being produced?","Topic 2 research in which the only ecosystem service under consideration is food production, is not of interest under this FOA. Refer to section I.C, Applications Specifically Not of Interest of the FOA."]
[37,"2022-03-08","Webinar","The FOA indated that a single site is non-compliant. How many sites is optimal?  What is the definition of a site. Could the sites be nearby? ","Research results must be scientifically rigorous and generalizable. A single site (or two sites that are adjacent to each other) may not provide sufficient variation in the data to draw robust scientific conclusions. For additional information please refer to Section V.A. of the FOA “Technical Review Criteria;” specifically, Criterion 1 for the full applications, “Technical Merit, Innovation, and Impact.” There is no requirement that research plans be identical at each site, but some comparison across sites is necessary to satisfy the stated goal of scientific rigor."]
[38,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Are donated solar panels from vendors allowable as In Kind?","Vendors cannot provide cost share. Please see Appendix A of the FOA for additional information on cost share. "]
[39,"2022-03-08","Webinar","What if only for food production but the local wildlife gets to eat from that?","Topic 2 research in which the only ecosystem service under consideration is food, is not of interest under this FOA. Refer to section I.C, Applications Specifically Not of Interest of the FOA."]
[40,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Is social science research of interest for this call?","“Projects in [topic 2] will improve solar energy siting practices by developing models, tools, or methodologies to characterize, quantify, and/or optimize ecosystem services in solar energy deployment decisions.” As community and landowner preferences are likely to be key inputs into the process of “optimizing” ecosystem services, social science research activities are eligible. Applicants must explain how their proposed activities achieve the goals of Topic 2 as stated in the FOA."]
[41,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Can the award be put solely towards supporting biodiversity and no funding towards energy production. Even though both are occuring in a space (aka money is needed for ecosystems, solar panels are already paid off)","There is no requirement that funding go towards energy production. Applicants must explain how their proposed activities achieve the R&D goals as stated in the FOA."]
[42,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Is this limited to certain wildfire [sic; assumed to be a typo for \"wildlife\"] areas? Or any area designated as wildlife appropriate?","All work performed under EERE awards must be performed in the United States. No further area limitations are specified in the FOA. Please refer to IV.J.iii for more information."]
[43,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Does \"food\" refer to just crops, or is it also applied to livestock?","\"Food\" is not limited to crops as written in the FOA."]
[44,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Does this call apply to any brownfield sites?","There is no requirement for the inclusion or exclusion of brownfield sites under this FOA."]
[45,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Can the award be used to offset interconnection costs that would otherwise make the project not economically viable?","All expenditures must be allowable, allocable, and reasonable in accordance with the applicable federal cost principles. Please refer to 2 CFR 200.405 Allocable Costs. In addition, please review Section I.B.i and I.B.ii of the FOA to ensure that the proposed project meets the R&D goals of this FOA."]
[46,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Creating pollinator habitat under solar panels. Do pollinators count as \"wildlife\"?","Pollinators are considered wildlife under this FOA. "]
[47,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Can you reiterate how much funding is available in this program, and do you have a target for the number of projects that the program would like to fund.","Please refer to Section II.A.i. Estimated Funding. "]
[48,"2022-03-08","Webinar","If you are involved in a supportive role on another DOE funding opportunity, can you still apply to be a primary recipient?","Involvement in other DOE awards does not impact eligibility for applying to this FOA. Please refer to section III, Eligibility Information of the FOA document. "]
[49,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Where can you find allowable award uses?","All expenditures must be allowable, allocable, and reasonable in accordance with the applicable federal cost principles. Refer to the following applicable federal cost principles for more information: Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 31 for For-Profit entities; and 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E - Cost Principles for all other non-federal entities."]
[50,"2022-03-08","Webinar","Is this award applicable for a comprehensive data solution (collection, storage, analysis of data) and economical IoT solutions?","Please refer to Section I.A, Background and Context, I.B, Topic Areas, and I.C, Applications Specifically Not of Interest of the FOA.  Prior to submission, DOE cannot comment on the eligibility of specific concepts."]
[51,"2022-03-29","Concept Paper","Do proposers put contingencies into proposals that depend on permitting?","Proposers should clearly outline risks to project success and mitigation measures that are being taken to manage this risk. See Sec V.A for how risk and risk mitigation are factored into technical review criteria for concept papers and full applications."]
[52,"2022-03-29","Concept Paper","Can we not include multiple wildlife monitoring and mitigation technologies in a single Topic area 1 proposal or multiple ecosystem service estimation methods in a single Topic area 2 proposal?","The full statement in Sec IV.C.i is “Each Concept Paper must be limited to a single concept or technology. Unrelated concepts and technologies should not be consolidated into a single Concept Paper.” The purpose of this restriction is to prevent “laundry list” proposals in which many disparate elements are proposed. A single proposal may include multiple technologies or methods as long as they form a coherent concept which can be evaluated as a whole."]
[53,"2022-03-30","Eligibility","I was recently invited to collaborate by two teams who are interested in applying to the SolWEB RFP as a co-PI. I was wondering whether it is possible to apply as a co-PI on two different grants to this RFP or whether I can only apply once. One team is applying to topic area 1 while the other is likely applying to topic area 2, in case that affects the response. ","See Sec III.F: “An entity may submit more than one Concept Paper and Full Application to this FOA, provided that each application describes a unique, scientifically distinct project and provided that an eligible Concept Paper was submitted for each Full Application.”"]
[54,"2022-03-30","Technical Topics","Can you clarify what is included as “technology” in this context? It seems like a different framing and focus than the way the FOA’s goals are described elsewhere (see quote below), which focus more broadly on solutions and strategies.  We are confused about the use of the term “technology” in describing what is required in the Concept notes (table on pages 33 and 34). ","1. “Technology” in this FOA should be interpreted broadly and is not limited to e.g., hardware innovation. Topic 1 projects “will develop innovative methods or technologies for avoiding, minimizing, or monitoring adverse impacts of solar energy on wildlife and/or maximizing benefits to wildlife.” Topic 2 projects “will improve solar energy siting practices by developing models, tools, or methodologies” (Sec I.B)."]
[55,"2022-03-30","Technical Topics","What the definition of \"commercial\" PV systems is? The solar arrays in Arkansas are largely built in fields to provide electricity to cities or corporations, and there is at least one case of a solar field that provides electricity for a wastewater treatment plant. Would these be considered \"commercial systems\"? What kinds of PV systems would be considered of interest in this FOA? ","“Commercial” solar in the context of the FOA refers to smaller, distributed generation systems which are co-located with the entity that consumes the power, such as the solar array that a business may construct on their own facilities for their own use. Large, ground-mounted solar arrays which interconnect to the transmission grid are “utility-scale” for the purposes of this FOA. See Sec I.A.ii: “Solar energy is defined in this document as either ground-mounted photovoltaic (PV) energy generation, including both utility-scale and community solar, or concentrating solar power. Residential and commercial PV systems are not of interest for this funding opportunity.”"]
[56,"2022-04-04","Concept Paper","Does the FOA exclude agrivoltaic proposals?","Agrivoltaics proposals are not excluded but the primary focus of this funding opportunity is not agricultural activity. Agrivoltaics proposals should address the goals of the FOA related to wildlife interactions and ecosystem services. See Sec I.C., Applications Specifically Not of Interest."]
[57,"2022-04-12","Concept Paper","Is this grant strictly for solar systems that are attached to the ground surface? Grant applications cannot be for roof or window mounted solar systems?","This FOA opportunity is for ground-mounted solar.  Please refer to Sec I.A.ii: “Solar energy is defined in this document as either ground-mounted photovoltaic (PV) energy generation, including both utility-scale and community solar, or concentrating solar power. Residential and commercial PV systems are not of interest for this funding opportunity” and Sec I.C: “The following types of applications will be deemed nonresponsive and will not be reviewed or considered…\n• Projects that include solar generation deployed on rooftops”"]
[58,"2022-04-27","Eligibility","As a federal employee can I participate in this FOA as a PI?","Per the FOA “Federal agencies and instrumentalities (other than DOE) are eligible to apply for funding as a subrecipient, but are not eligible to apply as a prime recipient.”  However, if federal employee is NOT participating in their official capacity and is submitting the application as an individual or on behalf of another entity, that application may still be eligible.  Federal employees participating NOT in their official capacity should ensure that they have received proper approval from their agency for this outside activity. "]
[59,"2022-05-19","Cost Sharing","If a 10% cost share is planned, is this part of the $1,000,000 minimum project cost?","Please refer to Appendix A: Cost Share Information of the FOA."]
[60,"2022-05-19","Application Content/Format","What is the resume length?  The FOA states 2 pages while Exchange states 1 page.","As per the FOA document, 2 pages for resume is correct."]
[61,"2022-05-19","Application Content/Format","What is the page limit for the Statement of Project Objectives?  Per the FOA table it is 5 pages and Exchange states 10 pages.","As per the FOA document, 5 pages for SOPO is correct."]
[62,"2022-05-19","Cost Sharing","What are typical ways to show cost share by academic applicants? Can for-profit subcontractor charges that are at a reduced hourly rate be shown as a cost-share? ","Please refer to Appendix A: Cost Share Information of the FOA."]
[63,"2022-05-19","Other","What should we put as the aniticpated start date of our project?","As per the FOA, anticipated award negotiations are from September 2022 to December 2022."]
[64,"2022-05-19","Due Dates","Can you please also provide the expected date for the Reviewer Comments to be made available, or at least the minimum amount of time provided to prepare the replies","Applicants will have 3 days to reply to reviewer comments."]
[65,"2022-05-20","Other","Please confirm that the allowable period of performance is indeed 48 months (or is it 36 months?) If 48-months is allowable, is it assumed that we need to develop a 48-month as three, 16-month budget periods?","As described in Sec II.A.ii of the FOA: “EERE anticipates making awards that will run from 24 months up to 48 months in length, comprised of one or more budget periods.” Applicants are free to propose budget periods that make sense for the proposed project schedule."]
[66,"2022-05-23","Application Content/Format","There is no mention of COAs needed in the solicitation.  Can you confirm no COA forms are needed?","Please refer to Section VI.B.xvii - Participants and Collaborating Organizations section of the FOA."]
[67,"2022-05-27","Other","Is it possible to shift a PI on a submitted concept paper when we submit the full application?","An applicant can change the PI on the full application. "]
[68,"2022-06-14","Other","Can the award, if awarded, be funded as an RWO?","Awards made through this FOA will be funded as Cooperative Agreements"]
[69,"2022-06-14","Cost Sharing","Does the total award include the cost share?  (i.e., if the maximum award is $2M, is the funding from DOE $1.8 with a 0.2 cost share)","Please refer to Appendix A; Cost Share Information of the FOA."]
[70,"2022-05-27","Eligibility","Can we change who the prime recipient is in between the concept paper and full application stages as long as the eligibility requirements are maintained? ","The Lead Organization and Teaming members can be changed in the Full Application portion of the submission process. Or the Full Application can submitted by the organization that submitted the concept paper. If that proposal is selected for negotiation, the prime recipient may submit a request to DOE to transfer the award to a different prime recipient. This request will be reviewed by the DOE Selection Official  and appropriate contracting staff to evaluate the benefit to DOE of the proposed transfer."]
[71,"2022-05-20","Cost Sharing","If a prime applicant is an FFRDC, and along with another subrecipient FFRDC will make up at least 50% of the work (i.e. prime alone is < 50%, but 2 FFRDCs team members together are > 50%), will this qualify for the Cost Share Waiver? ","To qualify for the Cost Share Waiver, eligible organizations must perform at least 50% of the budgeted work proposed in the project."]
[72,"2022-05-20","Cost Sharing","Is the calculation of the 50% minimum for the prime educational institution be combined with two campuses where an agreement is signed under a Board of Regents authority?","To qualify for the Cost Share Waiver, eligible organizations must perform at least 50% of the budgeted work proposed in the project."]
[73,"2022-05-19","Cost Sharing","On page 25 of the FOA it states an institute of higher education needs 10% cost share instead of 20% and mentions that we need to be able to verify it. What documentation is needed from us to verify we are an Institute of Higher Ed and that we are doing more than 50% of the work","The application documentation should reflect the organization type and the percentage of work that will be completed by all project participants (ie: application forms, technical volume, budget)."]
[74,"2022-05-18","Cost Sharing","One of our subrecipients is a for-profit company. Does the 10% Special Cost Share Waiver for Domestic Institutions of Higher Education flow down to all of our subrecipients or is the for-profit company required to fulfill a 20% cost share requirement","The Cost Share Waiver flows down to sub recipients.  For Profit recipients still need to provide full cost share."]
[75,"2022-06-01","Cost Sharing","The FOA states that there is a cost share waiver (cost share reduced to 10%) if the prime recipient meets certain criteria as outlined on page 25 (B1) and if the prime recipient does more than 50% of the work (B2).  What if the work is more evenly split amongst recipients, but the majority of the project work (more than 50%) or all work (100%) is conducted by recipients meeting the criteria of B1 (e.g. they are all domestic institutions of higher education or domestic nonprofit entities)?  Could the waiver allowing cost share of 10% still apply? ","To qualify for the Cost Share Waiver, eligible organizations must perform at least 50% of the budgeted work proposed in the project."]

{"sheet":"Admin Pick List","index":1,"n_rows":17,"n_cols":1,"rows_kept":17,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["Pick List"]
[]
["Registration Requirements"]
["Webinar"]
["Concept Paper"]
["Eligibility"]
["Labs/FFRDCs"]
["Foreign Entities/Work"]
["Cost Sharing"]
["Due Dates"]
["Application Content/Format"]
["Intellectual Property"]
["Data Management"]
["Other"]
["U.S. Manufacturing Plan"]
["Application Reviews"]
["Technical Topics"]