Question 1:
Currently the GEARED FOA shows a dollar value of $0. Does this mean the FOA is uncommitted or on hold?
Answer 1:
For specific information regarding the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) such as funding amount, please refer to the FOA posted on the DOE’s EERE eXchange site. https://eere-exchange.energy.gov/default.aspx
Question 1:
I am looking for the Intellectual Property Management Plan templates referred to in Grid Engineering for Accelerated Renewable Energy Deployment (GEARED) DE-FOA-0000856, pg. 57. This Link is dead: http://EERE.energy.gov/FundingAgreements/Overview.aspx
Answer 1:
An example of the suggested template has been posted under the required documents for the GEARED FOA. Please note that this form is labeled as an example and is not required.
Question 2:
I am having difficulty accessing the full announcement for DE-FOA-0000856
Answer 2:
The FOA can be located by clicking the link below and then clicking on “FULL TEXT: Grid Engineering for Accelerated Renewable Energy Deployment (GEARED)”. The FOA file itself is in a MS Word format.
https://eere-exchange.energy.gov/#FoaId3db7eaa1-1e51-4a6f-bfdd-0b2963443484
.
Question 3:
Section IV.C. of the FOA notes that the Concept Paper is due on 4/12, and "EERE will encourage a subset of Applicants to submit Full Applications. Other Applicants will be discouraged from submitting a Full Application... in an effort to save the Applicant the time and expense of preparing an application that is unlikely to be selected for award negotiations." However, the suggested submission date for the Full Application is only five days later on 4/17, with Applicants well into preparing their 40-page proposals before the Concept Papers are due. If these dates are incorrectly stated, could you please provide the correct deadlines for these submissions? What is the expected lag time between the Concept Paper deadline and the "encouraged" or "discouraged" notifications?
Answer 3:
As noted in the FOA, the Concept Paper is due on April 12, 2013 and the Full Application is due on April 19, 2013. In addition to providing basic information about a proposed project, for this FOA the Concept Paper serves primarily as a letter of intent to submit a Full Application. EERE intends to provide brief feedback on Concept Papers by April 15, 2013. Applicants who have been discouraged from submitting a Full Application may still submit a Full Application.
Question 4:
I have intention to submit a grant proposal to you for a solar driven alternator generator, any advice you can offer is appreciated in securing funds for this design and development.
Answer 4:
For information regarding the GEARED funding announcement please reference the posted FOA documents:
https://eere-exchange.energy.gov/#FoaId3db7eaa1-1e51-4a6f-bfdd-0b2963443484
Question 5:
The Grid Engineering for Accelerated Renewable Energy Deployment (GEARED) Funding Opportunity Announcement Funding Opportunity Announcement ( FOA ) Number: DE-FOA-0000856.
Answer 5:
The GEARED FOA can be accessed here:
https://eere-exchange.energy.gov/#FoaId3db7eaa1-1e51-4a6f-bfdd-0b2963443484
The link directly under FOA DOCUMENTS should load a word version of the posted FOA.
Question 6:
I have the following questions:
1. Are FFRDC/GOGO’s eligible for the full $200,000 award on Topic B- National Network Administrator (NNA) as the prime applicant without partners? (page 8 of the FOA indicates FFRDCs/GOGOs are only eligible for up to 50% of award funding as prime. Does this apply to Topic B – NNA?)
2. On page 17, the FOA states that one task for the NNA is “Supporting the DTTCs in providing short courses and seminars based on the analysis and R&D conducted”. Please explain what DOE intends by the word “providing”. Is the intention for the NNA to develop course content or simply circulate courses developed by other DTTCs and SunRISE FOA awardees?
Answer 6:
For Topic B - NNA, FFRDC's and GOGOs are eligible for up to 100 percent of award funding as a prime. The NNA may develop course content, however, the primary function of the NNA is to distribute and make available content provided by other sources, such as DTTCs and SUNRISE FOA awardees.
Question 7:
The FOA states on page 12 the following: “GEARED will not support undergraduate or graduate fellowships.” Later, in page 15, within the project activities section, it states: “Training programs may include elements such as: student support, internships, and coops;”
So it is unclear to me whether it is possible or not to budget support for PhD students (tuition + stipend), as it is customary in other DOE or NSF proposals.
Answer 7:
Student support is permissible for research and education, however, full fellowships (covering all expenses, tuition, stipends, health insurance, etc.) are discouraged. Budgeted stipends and/or tuitions levels should be comparable to the standard levels of support for equivalent or existing student support programs, internships or coops.
Question 8:
An “Evaluation Plan” is listed on Page 33 – as a requirement to the Project Narrative. Is there a page limit for this plan, given it is part of the Project Narrative?
Answer 8:
There is no page limit for the Evaluation Plan, but there is a page limit for the Project Narrative.
Question 9:
Please clarify the page limit for the “Statement of Project Objectives”. References on pages 6 & 32 (indicate 5 page maximum), and the SOPO template indicates 7 pages maximum.
Answer 9:
As stated in the FOA, the SOPO page limit is five pages.
Question 10:
If a university creates a new course or curriculum under FOA funding can they include the materials in a tuition supported program?
Answer 10:
If a university creates a new course or curriculum under FOA funding, they may include the materials in a tuition supported program.
Question 11:
"The NNA will support the means by which investigators and practitioners can share information and ideas, coordinate ongoing or planned training, analysis, research and development activities, foster synthesis and new collaborations, develop community standards, and in other ways advance technology, training, and education through communication and sharing of ideas."
Would you please provide clarification on the meaning of "community standards".
Answer 11:
Community standards are the standard practices for sharing information and methodologies between training consortia and the National Network Administrator.
Question 12:
Beginning on page 34, the GEARED FOA provides a table with "detailed guidance on the content and form of each component below."
The guidance provided seems more in line with Topic Area 1 Distributed Technology Training Consortia (DTTC) than Topic Area 2 National Network Administrator. Does DOE have any further content guidance for NNA applicants?
Answer 12:
No, DOE does not have further content guidance.
Question 13:
Please advise if the budget periods must be separated by year, or can we have Budget Period 1 identified as a 24 month period)?
Answer 13:
Projects are slated for five years of operation and should be divided into five separate one year budget periods.
Question 14:
The “performance category” required in concept papers and full applications refers to section I.E, which does not exist. Could you please clarify whether performance category means the topic area (i.e. 1 or 2, DTTC or NNA)? Could you also please verify that each topic area would require separate concept papers and full applications?
The bottom of page 12 includes this statement: “GEARED will not support undergraduate or graduate fellowships”. Does this preclude tuition scholarships (our usual terminology) for graduate students assigned to R&D activities on this project? Does it preclude monthly stipends for graduate students or work-study arrangements for undergraduates who might be assigned to the project?
Answer 14:
Please refer to previously posted FAQ’s for this FOA as these questions have been addressed.
Question 15:
Applicants are required to identify “Performance Category or Subcategory” in both the Concept Paper and the Full Application (0.5 page max). Description of this requirement on page 35 of the FOA states: “Each Full Application must identify the Performance Subcategory or Subcategories for the Applicant’s proposed technology.”
Is there a list of Performance Categories/Subcategories or is it up to the applicants to provide their own wordings?
Answer 15:
Please refer to Amendment 001 of the FOA as this language has been modified. Applicants should identify to which topic area they are applying in both the concept paper and full application.
Question 16:
The FOA references Section I.E. to see details for the Performance Subcategory description. I do not see a section I.E. in the FOA. Where can I find details on what DOE wants in this section?
Answer 16:
Please see the FOA Amendment 001.
Question 17:
The FOA indicates that the milestone/deliverables template should be a stand-alone file as well as included in the Project Narrative.
Applicants must submit proposed performance milestones and deliverables. The completed milestones should be submitted as a standalone addition to the applicant’s Project Narrative. (page 35)
The stand-alone document is not specified as one of the 15 files listed on pages 32, 33.
Please clarify
(1) If a stand -alone performance milestones and deliverables is required and
(2) If there is a template for this document?
QUESTION 2: The EERE Exchange web site has a PMP/Project Management Plan template. This is listed as a requirement within the Project Narrative section, but the FOA doesn’t indicate a template should be used.
Please clarify
(1) If the PMP/Project management template and instructions should be used within the project narrative, project management plan section
(2) If the PMP file is a template for deliverables and milestones.
Answer 17:
Please see the FOA Amendment 001. The PMP template may be used to complete the Milestones and Deliverables section of the Project Narrative.
Question 18:
The list on page 32-33 includes a bullet for an evaluation plan. This is not described in the section detailing what goes into each section- page 36-37. What is expected to be included in the evaluation plan and is this part of the project narrative or a stand-alone file?
Answer 18:
The Evaluation Plan is part of the Project Narrative and may include either an established methodology or a plan for developing an evaluation methodology.
Question 19:
Page 41 of the FOA states that “If a DOE FFRDC contractor is to perform a portion of the work, you must provide a DOE Field Work Proposal (FWP) in accordance with the requirements in DOE Order 412.1 Work Authorization System.”
If a FFRDC is responding as the Lead Organization, should the total project amount (including all participants) be included in the Field Work Proposal, or just the FFRDC's portion?
Answer 19:
If a FFRDC is responding as the Lead Organization, the total project amount including all participants should be included in the DOE Field Work Proposal.
Question 20:
Is the Tech to Market plan required for National Network Administrator topic?
Answer 20:
The Tech to Market plan is not required for the National Network Administrator topic.
Question 21:
Can you clarify what you mean by a data/meta-data strategy? (I don’t want to make assumptions)
Answer 21:
The data strategy should include a plan for sharing non-proprietary information that is developed or produced by participants within the network.
Question 24:
I have a question on the budget forms required for each Subawardee. On page 50 of the FOA, #11 states that the PMC 123.1 is required for each subaward budget. Is this the only form required for each subaward? Do they not need to submit an SF-424A and SF-424?
Answer 24:
Subawardees are not required to submit an SF-424A or SF-424. As per section VI.D.11 of the FOA, any subawardee that received more than $100,000 or performs 30% of the total work must submit a Budget Justification document (PMC 123.1).
Question 27:
The PMC123.1 budget justification available in the Required Documents section is for three-year projects. If we are proposing a 5-year project, are we to modify the PMC123.1, by adding columns for Year 4 and Year 5 throughout the workbook, in order to accommodate the 5-year costs?
Answer 27:
The PMC 123.1 Budget Justification, should be modified as needed by the applicant in order to accommodate their proposed budget.
Question 35:
My organization was selected to submit a full application to this solicitation. The solicitation suggested that selection notification was tentatively planned for June 2013. Can you provide an updated anticipated deadline for notification of selection?
Answer 35:
Applications are currently under review for selection. Once selections have been made applicants will be notified in writing.