Frequently Asked Questions

Select a FOA to view questions and answers for the specific funding opportunity. Alternatively select "Non-FOA related items" to view system FAQ items.

Question 1: I just have a quick question. How many awards do you plan on giving through this particular grant?
Answer 1:

Under this announcement, DOE expects to make 20-25 awards.

Question 2: I wasn't able to find the Attachment 1 spreadsheet referenced in the text posted online. Can you direct me?
Answer 2: When you log onto the EERE eXCHANGE website, click on Funding Opportunity, then click on DE-FOA-0000549 (or scroll down to this FOA) then click View Required Application Documents, and then click Attachment 1.
Question 7: Can a Trade Association apply for the DE-FOA-0000549 projects?
Answer 7:

Please refer to Section III.A., Eligible Applicants, in the FOA.  It is referenced here for your convenience:

A. Eligible Applicants

It is intended to restrict eligibility for this FOA to applicant entities that satisfy the following requirements:

• Located in the United States and
• State or territorial governments; or
• Local governments; or
• Consortia, made up of regional or statewide teams of local governments, large single jurisdictions, or Indian Tribes; or
• Non-profit or for-profit entities authorized to act on behalf of a consortia of state and/or local governments, and 
• The total population represented by eligible entities for this FOA must be 500,000 or greater as defined by the 2010 report of the U.S. Census Bureau.

Question 8: This question is in regards to the applicant eligibility criteria for DE-FOA-0000549: Sunshot Initiative: Rooftop Solar Challenge To Induce Market Transformation: Can a local government, with a total population of less than 200,000, serve as the lead applicant for a consortia, made up of a regional or statewide team of local governments, if the total population represented by the consortia is 500,000 or greater?
Answer 8: Yes, as described, the local government would be able to apply under this opportunity announcement.
Question 9: What is the DOE point of contact (POC) that applicants should use to address letters of intent, letter of commitment, and industry verification?
Answer 9: Please address the letter of intent: "To Whom it May Concern."  Letters of commitment should be addressed to the organization that is applying for the opportunity.  The  industry verification letter should be addressed to "Department of Energy Reviewers" as stated in Appendix E.
Question 10: I am a female general contractor in business for over 12 years with a great idea that can help every American save a large amount of energy from their rooftop at an affordable price! I would like to make more of the product for testing to obtain the best energy efficient savings. I was seeking for grant opportunities and came upon the Rooftop Solar Challenge. I need to know if this is the correct grant to apply for regarding my idea! A quick reply would be appreciated!
Answer 10:

Thank you for your interest in this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA).  The objective of this FOA is to achieve measurable improvements in market conditions for rooftop photovoltaic (PV) across the United States, with an emphasis on streamlined and standardized permitting and interconnection processes.  Please refer to Section I. Funding Opportunity Description of the FOA document for the specific purpose of this FOA. Successful applications will intimately address the FOA Scope as outlined in this Section.    

For all other opportunities, please visit our websites at: http://www.eere.energy.gov, http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar and http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/sunshot/.
For more technical solar information, please visit the National Renewable Energy Laboratory website at http://www.nrel.gov/solar/.

Question 11: My organization is currently developing a comprehensive Green industrial cluster in Staten Island, New York. One of the components is renewable and alternative energy – especially solar development. I am curious as to if our project would be suitable for this grant program and if so, how we can facilitate application. Please email or call me at your convenience.
Answer 11:

Thank you for your interest in this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA).  The objective of this FOA is to achieve measurable improvements in market conditions for rooftop photovoltaic (PV) across the United States, with an emphasis on streamlined and standardized permitting and interconnection processes.  Please refer to Section I. Funding Opportunity Description of the FOA document for the specific purpose of this FOA. Successful applications will intimately address the FOA Scope as outlined in this Section.    

For all other opportunities, please visit our websites at: http://www.eere.energy.gov, http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar and http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/sunshot/.
For more technical solar information, please visit the National Renewable Energy Laboratory website at http://www.nrel.gov/solar/.

Question 12: I understand that I'm supposed to subscribe to the FOA at grants.gov to get updates. I cannot find FOA 549 at grants.gov. Grants.gov does have FOA 526 with a similar title, but different due dates (DE-FOA-0000526 required a response by by May 6.) Likewise, I find no mention of DE-FOA-0000549 at FedConnect, which also does have FOA 526 listed. Is there a relationship between FOA 526 and FOA 549?
Answer 12: You will need to specifically find FOA DE-FOA0000549 at grants.gov.  Please log into grants.gov at http://grants.gov. Then, on the left side of the screen, click on “Find Grant Opportunities.”  Click on “Basic Search” and, in the “Search by Funding Opportunity Number:” box, type “DE-FOA-0000549” and click “Search.” There is no relationship between FOAs DE-FOA-0000549 and DE-FOA0000526 for application purposes. FOA DE-FOA0000549 is not posted on www.fedconnect.net. 
Question 13: In EERE-eXCHANGE, when I click the "apply" button I get a page where I'm to fill in a "concept paper." Is this the same as the Letter of Intent which is required? I need to create an application record in EERE eXCHANGE to receive notices of changes. Is there a way to create an application record without submitting a "concept paper"? Since the "concept paper" template warns that the abstract should be the same as in the application document, I want to wait until all the information is ready before submitting it.
Answer 13:

Yes, for purposes of this page in eXCHANGE, "concept paper" is the same as the Letter of Intent that is required for this FOA.

When you create an application record, you will need to submit the Letter of Intent.  Please be aware that you will have the opportunity to re-submit a revised Letter of Intent or application for any reason as long as the relevant submission is submitted by the specified deadline.  This is also true for the abstract.

 

Question 14: I am an intern for the City of [Name Removed]. Our department was wondering whether other cities in the state of [Name Removed] had shown an interest in the Rooftop Solar Challenge, or if they had signed in to the most recent webinar hosted by the DOE? If you had contact names or numbers it would be greatly appreciated.
Answer 14: All DOE-hosted webinars related to this FOA will be recorded and posted to www.solar.energy.gov/challenge.  DOE does not share registration lists for webinars or the contact information for those who submit questions to this Exchange site. 
Question 15: The FOA states that the entity applying must have a population over 500,000. The City of [Name Removed] is interested in applying but has a population of 471,991, a difference of 28,009. Because our city is a designated "Solar America City" is it possible to get a waiver for this 500,000 population requirement?
Answer 15:

Applicant teams must represent a population of at least 500,000.  DOE encourages jurisdictions to partner as necessary to meet the minimum population threshold.  Achieving standardization of policies and processes across major metropolitan areas and multiple jurisdictions is critical to solar market development.

Question 16: Can a team add an additional jurisdiction as a team member after submitting the letter of intent?
Answer 16: Yes.  The letter of intent should reflect the team members as comprehensively as possible, but applicants are permitted to add additional partners after the letter of intent has been submitted.
Question 17: The FOA states that non-profit organizations may be lead applicants for this funding opportunity if they are "authorized to act on behalf" of a group of local governments. Can you explain what "authorized to act on behalf" means?
Answer 17: The lead applicant must submit letters of commitment from the chief elected official of each participating jurisdiction.  These letters of commitment must reflect each's jurisdiction's commitment to contribute cost share and to work according to the proposed workplan.  If a non-profit organization as lead applicant submits such letters from participating jurisdictions, the non-profit organization is considered "authorized to act on behalf" of those jurisdictions for the purposes of the Challenge.
Question 18: If a county applies, is the county required to obtain letters of commitment from all jurisdictions within the county?
Answer 18: No, a county may apply on its own as long as it meets the minimum population threshold (500,000) on its own, not including the population of jurisdictions within the county.  For the purposes of applying to this funding opportunity, a county must subtract from its reported population the population of any jurisdictions within the county that do not provide letters of commitment to participate on the applicant team. 
 
The exception to this rule is if a county is the authority-having-jurisdiction with regard to solar permitting for jurisdictions within the county.  In this case, a county may include the population of those jurisdictions in its reported population without providing letters of commitment from those jurisdictions.
Question 19: The FOA indicates that applicants must submit a letter of support from the primary load-serving utility in each jurisdiction, and Attachment 1 indicates that responses to utility-related questions should be based on the primary load-serving utility in each jurisdiction. Can you define "primary load-serving utility."
Answer 19: The primary load-serving utility is the utility that serves the greatest number of customers within the jurisdiction
Question 20: Several questions in Attachment 1 refer to processes for "typical installations." Can you define "typical installations"?
Answer 20:

For the purposes of responding to Attachment 1, typical installations can be defined as follows:

 

For Residential Installations:

       Power rating: approximately 4kW.

       Structural:

1.      Code compliant structure

2.      Engineered mounting system designed for attaching PV to the structure

3.      Distributed weight of less than 5 lbs./ft2 and less than 45 lbs. per attachment.

 

       Electrical: Meet the minimum electrical requirements as defined in the Solar ABCs Expedited Permit Process for PV Systems, which includes:

1.      PV modules, utility-interactive inverters, and combiner boxes are identified for use in PV systems.

2.      The PV array is composed of 4 series strings or less per inverter, and 15 kWSTC or less.

3.      The total inverter capacity has a continuous AC power output 13,440 Watts or less

4.      The AC interconnection point is on the load side of service disconnecting means (NEC 690.64(B)).

5.      The electrical diagram (E1.1) can be used to accurately represent the PV system. (See page 9 of Solar ABC’s Expedited Permit Process for PV Systems report).

 

For Commercial Installations:

 

Due to the variability in commercial rooftop PV systems, the Challenge is less prescriptive in defining a “typical installation” for commercial projects. However, several basic assumptions can be made:

 

·         Power rating: approximately 200kW

 

 ·         Structural: the roof, as constructed, does not need structural enhancements.

 

Question 21: If an applicant team is composed of multiple jurisdictions, how should the applicant fill out Attachment 1?
Answer 21:

A team composed of multiple jurisdictions must submit one copy of Attachment 1 for each participating jurisdiction.  The Lead Applicant is responsible for ensuring that the application package includes one copy of Attachment 1 for each jurisdiction and that answers are based on the most accurate information available.  Files should be named according to the naming convention on p.25 of the FOA.

 

 

Question 22: The requirement that applicants represent a population pool >500,000 will exclude tribal participation. The sovereign status of Indian tribes establishes a separation between state and local governments and tribal governments that Tribes are generally hesitant to cross. Inter-tribal cooperation is not precluded, but is generally impractical; especially given the minimum population requirement. It would require the cooperation of as many as hundreds of tribes over an enormous geographic area to satisfy the population requirement. The solar challenge goals are critical to creative approaches to removal of market barriers to widespread PV implementation in tribal communities, but the restrictions on the program effectively eliminate tribal participation. What can DOE do to ensure fair participation by Tribes in the solar challenge initiative? Reduce/eliminate the population requirement for tribal participation? Create a set aside for tribes from the pool of available funds?
Answer 22:

This FOA is designed to address the lack of standardization of policies and processes related to rooftop solar projects.  DOE seeks to fund teams that can implement standardized processes across units of government in  major existing or potential solar markets.  For this reason, DOE is requiring that applicant teams represent a minimum population of 500,000. DOE encourages Tribes to partner as necessary to meet the eligibility requirements.   

Question 23: Does this grant program prohibit costs related to solar equipment and materials? If equipment is an allowable cost is there a Buy American requirement?
Answer 23:

 Costs related to equipment and materials will not be prohibited unless the costs are not adequately justified, or if they are unallowable according to the applicable Cost Principles.  As stated in Section IV.C.7. of the FOA, the applicant must, as part of its budget justification, "provide a list of equipment and cost of each item providing a basis of cost such as vendor quotes, catalog prices, prior invoices, etc., and briefly justifying its need as it applies to the Statement of Project Objectives."

It is the sense of the Congress that, to the greatest extent practicable, all equipment and products purchased with funds made available under this award should be American-made.

Question 24: The Collaborative is examining the integration of software to improve customer response mechanisms and to streamline solar permitting/internconnection processes. Is this integration too premature to include in Phase I?
Answer 24: We anticipate that many teams will use IT solutions to improve their permitting and interconnection processes. Including this information is appropriate.
Question 25: Can you clarify the grant term for Phase I? Is it one year or three years?
Answer 25: As stated in the amendment to the FOA recently posted, the period of performance for Phase 1 is one year, and the period of performance for Phase 2 is up to two years.
Question 26: Under DE-FOA-0000549: SunShot Initiative: Rooftop Solar Challenge to Induce Market Transformation , we have four subcontractors with a budget above $100,00. They each prepared a budget justification in the .xls format. However, in the Exchange system, we're only able to upload one file. We attempted to combine all of the subcontractor files, but were unsuccessful. Is there another way to upload multiple budget justifications?
Answer 26:

Multiple subrecipient budget files can be uploaded as a New Additional File, under Additional Files in the Upload and Submit tab. 

Question 27: Can you advise whether [Applicant Name Removed] is eligible to submit a proposal to the SunShot Initiative: Rooftop Solar Challenge to Induce Market Transformation?
Answer 27:

Please refer to Section III, Eligibility Information, in the FOA:

 It is intended to restrict eligibility for this FOA to applicant entities that satisfy the following requirements:

 •     Located in the United States and

     State or territorial governments; or

     Local governments; or

     Consortia, made up of regional or statewide teams of local governments, large single jurisdictions, or Indian Tribes; or

     Non-profit or for-profit entities authorized to act on behalf of a consortia of state and/or local governments, and 

     The total population represented by eligible entities for this FOA must be 500,000 or greater as defined by the 2010 report of the U.S. Census Bureau.

 Please also note that DOE/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Federal Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) and non-DOE FFRDC’s, are not eligible to apply.

Question 28: Can you please provide me with the phone number and access code to participate in the following webinars for the SunShot Initiative? WEBINAR 1: FOA Overview 06/29/2011, 2:00 PM- 3:30 PM ET WEBINAR 2: Permitting and Interconnection Processes Overview, 07/06/2011, 2:00 PM- 3:00 PM ET WEBINAR 3: Net Metering and Interconnection Standards Overview, 07/13/2011, 2:00 PM- 3:00 PM ET WEBINAR 4: Financing Options and Planning and Zoning Overview, 07/20/2011, 2:00 PM- 3:00 PM ET
Answer 28:

You will need to register for each webinar by clicking the applicable links listed in Appendix F of the FOA (also referenced below for your convenience).  When you click on these links, you will need to fill out the applicable information and click the "Register Now" button.  Once you click this button, your information is submitted to the Webinar organizer, who will use it to communicate with you regarding these events.

WEBINAR 1: Please register at: https://www3.gotomeeting.com/register/313314742

WEBINAR 2: Please register at: https://www3.gotomeeting.com/register/123144102

WEBINAR 3: Please register at: https://www3.gotomeeting.com/register/276402534

WEBINAR 4: Please register at: https://www3.gotomeeting.com/register/803661734

Question 29: [Recipient Name removed] is very interested in applying for FOA-0000549 Rooftop Solar Challenge to Induce Market Transformation, and we appreciate this opportunity. We have a question regarding eligibility. We would apply as [Recipient Name removed] (including unincorporated areas and incorporated areas (cities) in order to meet the 500,000 population criteria. Would this be acceptable? Would we be eligible to apply as a large jurisdiction working with our cities? A main vehicle for coordination with our cities would be through [Recipient Name Removed] [website removed] , a cooperative and collaborative public inter-jurisdictional forum consisting of representatives from the county and each of the cities as well as from the [Name Removed]. We hope that we are eligible to apply for this grant and look forward to hearing from you on this determination.
Answer 29:

Applicant teams must represent a population of at least 500,000.  DOE encourages jurisdictions to partner as necessary to meet the minimum population threshold.  Achieving standardization of policies and processes across major metropolitan areas and multiple jurisdictions is critical to solar market development.

A county may apply on its own as long as it meets the minimum population threshold (500,000) on its own, not including the population of jurisdictions within the county.  For the purposes of applying to this funding opportunity, a county must subtract from its reported population the population of any jurisdictions within the county that do not provide letters of commitment to participate on the applicant team. 

The exception to this rule is if a county is the authority-having-jurisdiction with regard to solar permitting for jurisdictions within the county.  In this case, a county may include the population of those jurisdictions in its reported population without providing letters of commitment from those jurisdictions.

Question 30: Please confirm that the District of Columbia is in the Northeast Region.
Answer 30: The District of Columbia is in the Northeast Region.
Question 31: Our agency is registered in the EERE eXCHANGE website, however as the AOR of our agency will I need to register my name with the EERE eXCHANGE to submit the Letter of Intent and application, or will the agency’s name registration be enough for submissions?
Answer 31: As stated in the FOA, it is recommended that each organization or business unit, whether acting as a team or a single entity, utilize one account as the appropriate contact information for each submission. An individual's name is not required, however notifications will be sent to the email address provided.
Question 32: The Letter of Intent instructions on pg 18 of the funding opportunity number DE-FOA-0000549 indicates that the Letter of Intent should be e-mailed via the EERE eXCHANGE, but for creative purposes, is there an address that I could add to my document?
Answer 32:

Letters of Intent (LOI) must be submitted via the EERE eXCHANGE at http://eere.energy.gov/financing/exchange.  This is the only address to submit the Letter of Intent. If you would like to add an address to the LOI heading, you can use:

 US Department of Energy

Golden Field Office

1617 Cole Boulevard

Golden, CO 80401

 However, mailing or sending any documents to this address will not constitute submittal of a Letter of Intent.

Question 33: If your application submission was done before the August 31st, and something was found with the submitted application, does the EERE eXCHANGE send your application back and allow you to make changes?
Answer 33: You will have the opportunity to re-submit a revised Letter of Intent or revised application for any reason as long as the relevant submission is submitted by the specified deadline. However, the eXCHANGE system will not reject applications based on the content of application documents. Content of application documents will not be reviewed before submission deadlines.
Question 34: Could you explain blended cost share and how it comes into play regarding the FOA? On page 47 of the FOA, it describes the cost share for a project with four task requirements. Is the cost share information on pg 47 an explanation on how to do the cost share calculations regarding the four main Action areas for Phase 1?
Answer 34:

As stated in Section III.B. of the FOA:

Applicants will be required to demonstrate a minimum 10% cost share for Phase 1 and, should DOE choose to move forward with Phase 2 of this effort, a minimum 20% cost share will be required.  Cost share may consist of cash or in-kind contributions from the lead applicant or partners.

As an example, the minimum applicant cost share requirement for a hypothetical project with a Total Project Cost of $555,555 would be:

 

Applicant Phase 1 share, 10%    $55,555

DOE Phase 1 share, 90%          $500,000

Total Phase 1 Project Cost:     $555,555

 

Cost share may consist of cash or in-kind contributions from the lead applicant or partners.

Please note that the required minimum applicant cost share percentage is not based on the Federal share but, rather, is based on the Total Project Cost.

Question 35: We read in the Funding Opportunity Announcement that a Letter of Intent is due by July 29. I am writing to find out whether a letter of intent is expected from each of the communities that make up the team of local governments submitting the application for the DOE Rooftop Solar Challenge.
Answer 35:

Only one letter of intent is required for each individual application; however, the letter of intent must include the lead applicant name and names of all anticipated partners, as stated in Section IV.B. of the FOA:

The Letter of Intent must include the following information:

1.    Lead Applicant and names of all anticipated partners

2.    Title of the project

3.    One page abstract describing the project

4.    Estimated total DOE funding request

5.    The name of the Project Director/Principal Investigator(s)
Question 36: I am with an energy company and we are interested in applying for funding opportunity, DE-FOA 0000549 SunShot Initiative. Since we are not a governmental entity are we eligible for this funding? And what should go in the abstract? Please advise. Thank you
Answer 36:

Please refer to Section III.A., Eligible Applicants, in the FOA.  It is referenced here for your convenience:

 A. Eligible Applicants

 It is intended to restrict eligibility for this FOA to applicant entities that satisfy the following requirements:

 • Located in the United States and

• State or territorial governments; or

• Local governments; or

• Consortia, made up of regional or statewide teams of local governments, large single jurisdictions, or Indian Tribes; or • Non-profit or for-profit entities authorized to act on behalf of a consortia of state and/or local governments, and • The total population represented by eligible entities for this FOA must be 500,000 or greater as defined by the 2010 report of the U.S. Census Bureau.

The abstract should contain a description of the project, as stated in Section IV.B. of the FOA.

Question 37: I have designed a dual purpose solar porch roof for both energy and sun protection that is NOT mounted on the concrete roof, but attached to it. Would this opportunity be appropriate for funding or partial funding for the construction of a demonstration home that is both disaster proof and zero energy?
Answer 37:

The Challenge is intended to support local and regional teams representing populations of at least 500,000 in improving market conditions for rooftop PV by addressing permitting processes, interconnection and net metering standards, financing options, and planning and zoning issues. 

 While demonstration projects are not prohibited as an activity under the Challenge, the development and demonstration of new PV technologies or applications is not the focus of this funding opportunity.

Question 38: I heard there was going to be a webinar on Wednesday, can you provide a link? I cannot seem to find it on your website.
Answer 38:

You will need to register for this webinar by clicking the applicable link listed in Appendix F of the FOA (also referenced below for your convenience).  When you click on the link, you will need to fill out the applicable information and click the "Register Now" button.  Once you click this button, your information is submitted to the Webinar organizer, who will use it to communicate with you regarding this event.

 WEBINAR 1

Wednesday, June 29, 2:00pm-3:30pm ETPlease register at: https://www3.gotomeeting.com/register/313314742

Question 39: A state university would like to apply on behalf of the entire state, or, alternatively, a group of counties and municipalities within the state. Please confirm that a letter from the state's energy office would suffice as authorization to apply on behalf of the state (as opposed to the state's Governor). Since the university does not represent a specific population, I assume that they cannot apply in their own right.
Answer 39:

All applicants must submit a letter of support, at a minimum, or a letter of commitment (which would include a commitment to provide cost-share) from the head of the state energy office or equivalent agency.

A university may apply as a lead applicant but must partner with local jurisdictions. The population represented by a given applicant is calculated as the sum of the populations of local jurisdictions that submit letters of commitment to participate on the team.

Question 40: Figure 1 on Page 9 of the FOA states that, "...DOE will facilitate collaboration among awardees in each of the regions shown in Figure 2 to develop regional best practices for permitting and interconnection..." However, in the text of the FOA, it states that Phase 2 will focus on state/regional standardization of permitting processes, and does not mention interconnection. Which one is correct?
Answer 40:

Figure 1 is incorrect, interconnection is not part of Phase 2.  Please refer to Page 11 of the FOA that states:

Potential Phase 2 Action Areas:

     STATE/REGIONAL STANDARDIZATION OF PERMITTING PROCESSES:  Achieve implementation of common process framework for PV permitting throughout the awardee’s state, and more broadly if possible. 

Question 41: Would the lead applicant be able to subcontract out to county governments to assist with the work? Would it be easier for said county governments to apply as an applicant – and would they be eligible to do so (even though they do not issue permits) as long as municipalities in their territory are cost-share partners in the application?
Answer 41:

Yes, the lead applicant may subcontract with county governments.  A county government may also apply as a lead applicant even if it is not the relevant authority-having jurisdiction for solar permitting, as long as the application includes letters of commitment from municipalities with a total population greater than 500,000.

Question 42: Is the 10% cost share a total cost share? Or is each applicant expected to contribute 10%?
Answer 42:

10% is the total cost share required from the applicant team as a whole; the distribution of cost-share within a team is at the applicant's discretion.

Question 43: How does the DOE anticipate local entities to address net metering and interconnection standards knowing that they don't have control over how those policies are shaped at the state level?
Answer 43:

DOE encourages applicants to partner with organizations as necessary to achieve the goals of the funding opportunity. 

Question 44: If our state's interconnection and net metering standards are already scored well, what criteria are you judging an applicant on in that regard?
Answer 44:

The FOA is designed to support teams in increasing market maturity such that by the end of Phase 1 the team achieves a minimum score of 800/1000 on the market assessment, and higher if possible.  Applicants should therefore focus their plan on the action areas necessary to raise their score to at least the minimum level.  In making initial selections, DOE will consider the merit review criteria listed on pages 28-29 of the FOA.

Question 45: How does the DOE score crossing state lines that have vastly different aspects regarding net metering, interconnection, and RPS/REC markets?
Answer 45:

For the initial award selection, DOE will evaluate all applications based on the merit review criteria listed on pages 28-29 of the FOA.  At the end of Phase 1, one of the factors determing eligibility for a potential Phase 2 will be the team's score on the market assessment, which is based on the lowest score of any participating local jurisdiction.

Question 46: Is there any connection between this SunShot Initiative grant and Solar America Communities initiatives that are currently somewhat underway?
Answer 46:

The Rooftop Solar Challenge is based in part on the successes and lessons learned from the 25 Solar America Cities partnerships.  The Solar America Cities partnerships resulted in best practices and innovative models for removing market barriers to solar and reducing PV system costs through smarter processes.  DOE has published a compilation of best practices for local governments interested in increasing local solar energy use titled Solar Powering Your Community: A Guide for Local Governments, available at www.solaramericacommunities.energy.gov/resources <http://www.solaramericacommunities.energy.gov/resources> .  The 25 Solar America Cities are treated equally to all other jurisdictions in regard to their eligibility for the Challenge.

DOE's broader Solar America Communities Outreach effort will complement the Challenge by providing introductory information on solar as an energy solution to thousands of local governments across the country through workshops and multi-media communications, while the Challenge awardees will represent a more in depth effort by DOE to develop 25 strong regional markets.

Question 47: How does the DOE anticipate municipalities, such as in Pennsylvania and New Jersey where land use jurisdiction lay solely with the municipalities, to address net metering and interconnection standards (among other issues) when these policies are shaped at the state level? Will this grant opportunity be biased towards those applicants that have greater regional jurisdictional control, or will the awarding decision take into account the inroads that can be made by individual municipalities partnering with County and regional partners?
Answer 47:

DOE encourages applicants to partner with organizations as necessary to achieve the goals of the funding opportunity.  The FOA is designed to support teams in increasing market maturity such that by the end of Phase 1 the team achieves a minimum score of 800/1000 on the market assessment, and higher if possible.  Applicants should therefore focus their plan on the action areas necessary to raise their score to at least the minimum level.  In making initial selections, DOE will consider the merit review criteria listed on pages 28-29 of the FOA.

Question 48: Is an application that comprises jurisdictions in more than one state acceptable, given that the FOA states that Phase 2 awardees will be "responsible for implementing that common permitting process throughout their state or territory"? (page 11). What is the normal turn-around time for answers being posted?
Answer 48:

Yes, an application that comprises jurisdictions in more than one state is acceptable.

DOE will try to respond to a question within 3 business days, unless a similar question and answer have already been posted on the website.

Question 49: Does each team partner need to provide a 10 percent match, or only the team as a whole?
Answer 49: 10% is the total cost share required from the applicant team as a whole; the distribution of cost-share within a team  is at the applicant's discretion.
Question 50: Phase 2 has a goal of statewide implementation within a respective state. Are teams that include jurisdictions from more than one state recommended (or even eligible)?
Answer 50: An application that comprises jurisdictions in more than one state is eligible and acceptable.
Question 51: What guidance can you provide for a multi-jurisdiction team, in determining cost share for each team member?
Answer 51: 10% is the total cost share required from the applicant team as a whole; the distribution of cost-share within a team is at the applicant's discretion.
Question 52: Is the market assessment only due with the application, or does it have to be submitted with the letter of intent?
Answer 52: The market assessment is due with the full application only and is not required to be submitted with the letter of intent.
Question 53: Where will the presentations be available after the webinar? Is it downloadable at DOE as a pdf or other?
Answer 53:

The presentations are recorded and will be accessible from the Rooftop Solar Challenge home page at www.solar.energy.gov/challenge.

Question 54: How do we register for the webinars mentioned on the FOA - mod 1? Is the content of the June 29 webinar available?
Answer 54:

You will need to register for this webinar by clicking the applicable link listed in Appendix F of the FOA (also referenced below for your convenience).  When you click on the link, you will need to fill out the applicable information and click the "Register Now" button.  Once you click this button, your information is submitted to the Webinar organizer, who will use it to communicate with you regarding this event.

This presentation was recorded and it will be accessible from the Rooftop Solar Challenge home page at www.solar.energy.gov/challenge. 

WEBINAR 2

SunShot Initiative: Rooftop Solar Challenge to Induce Market Transformation: Permitting and Interconnection Processes Overview

Wednesday, July 6, 2:00pm-3:00pm ET

Please register at: https://www3.gotomeeting.com/register/123144102

 

WEBINAR 3

SunShot Initiative: Rooftop Solar Challenge to Induce Market Transformation: Net Metering and Interconnection Standards Overview

Wednesday, July 13, 2:00pm-3:00pm ET

Please register at: https://www3.gotomeeting.com/register/276402534

 

WEBINAR 4

SunShot Initiative: Rooftop Solar Challenge to Induce Market Transformation: Financing Options and Planning and Zoning Overview

Wednesday, July 20, 2:00pm-3:00pm ET

Please register at: https://www3.gotomeeting.com/register/803661734

 

Question 55: I am inquiring about the eligibility criteria for the Sunshot Initiative: Rooftop Solar Challenge to Induce Market Transformation CFDA # 81.117. Under additional information on eligibility, it states that the total population represented by eligible entities . . . must be 500,000 or greater. Can you please clarify that eligibility requirement as it relates to Indian Tribes or Territories? Are we ineligible given that we only have a population of 180,000?
Answer 55: This FOA is designed to address the lack of standardization of policies and processes related to rooftop solar projects.  DOE seeks to fund teams that can implement standardized processes across units of government in  major existing or potential solar markets.  For this reason, DOE is requiring that applicant teams represent a minimum population of 500,000. DOE encourages Tribes to partner as necessary to meet the eligibility requirements.
Question 56: This question pertains to DE-FOA-0000549, page 10 footnote number 3 and footnote number 5. The funding opportunity states, “In developing permitting processes for residential systems, awardees should draw from the Solar America Board for Codes and Standards Expedited Permit Process for PV Systems, available at www.solarabcs.org/permitting , to the extent it is useful and appropriate. How should the awardees use the Solar America Board Codes and Standards document? Which section of this document is important? Is it the one-page Summary, or the full report? Are the awardees required to complete the fill-in form section of this document? I have tried to download the full report but cannot. Is there a better link for this document?
Answer 56: DOE recommends that entities interested in improving PV permitting processes review the full report, available at http://solarabcs.org/about/publications/reports/expedited-permit/pdfs/Expermitprocess.pdf. This is not a required application document for this Funding Opportunity.
Question 57: We know that lobby firms are precluded from being prime contractors aon the FOA 0000549 for the SunShot Solar Challenge. However, could you tell us if they can serve as sub-contractors to a prime contractor or if their involvement is not allowed in any capacity.
Answer 57:

Under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, an organization described in section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 which engages in lobbying activities shall not be eligible for the receipt of Federal funds constituting an award, grant, contract, loan, or any other form.

This applies to both prime and subrecipients/subcontractors.

 

Question 58: Please explain how to use Table 2 on page 14 of the FOA. It states that scoring for net metering and interconnection standards are based on the Network for New Energy Choices publication, Freeing the Grid, 2010 Edition and that the state letter grades established in the report will be translated into numeric scores as according to Table 2. I’m not quite sure I understand how this calculation will occur since no letter grades are listed in Table 2. Can you please provide some guidance on this section?
Answer 58: Table 2 should include letter grades in the lefthand column: A, B, C, D, F from top to bottom.  DOE will host a webinar on July 13 with more information on the market assessment (Attachment 1) with respect to interconnection and net metering standards.  You may register for the webinar, as well as view the webinar materials after July 13, at www.solar.energy.gov/challenge.
Question 59: If there aren’t any solar companies that have installed projects within a jurisdiction completing the Market Assessment, how would a solar company/installer be able to certify that the costs are accurate?
Answer 59: If there are no existing solar installations within a jurisdiction, the jurisdiction is not required to submit an industry verification letter.
Question 60: In the letter of commitment from the major power provider in a jurisdiction, does it have to state that the power company intends to modify their interconnection process, interconnection standards, net metering policies, etc.? Or is their commitment to the process and/or contribution the most important aspect?
Answer 60:

There are two types of letters that can be submitted with the application: letters of support and letters of commitment.  The difference is that letters of commitment include a commitment to contribute cost share.  The type of letter required from the primary load-serving utility is a letter of support, although utilities are welcome and encouraged to provide cost share, in which case the letter submitted would be a letter of commitment.

As stated on page 10 of the FOA, letters of support must indicate that the entity is supportive of the applicant's proposal and will engage in activities as appropriate to help the applicant achieve the proposed objectives.

Question 61: On Page 8 of the FOA, there is a statement about Letters of Support. If the applicant is the State Energy Office, would this entity need only to collect Letters of Support from each participating jurisdiction? Also, would the State Energy Office have to supply Letters of Support back to the jurisdictions applicants as well?
Answer 61:

If the lead applicant is a State Energy Office, they must submit letters of commitment from each participating jurisdiction, as well as letters of support from the primary load-serving utility in each jurisdiction.  The State Energy Office does not have to supply letters of support back to the participating jurisdictions.

Note that the mention of letters of support occurs on page 10 of the modified FOA, not page 8.  Please be sure you are viewing the latest version of the FOA.

Question 62: The FOA states: “The lead applicant must submit letters of commitment from the chief elected official of each participating jurisdiction. These letters of commitment must reflect each jurisdiction's commitment to contribute cost share and to work according to the proposed workplan.” Who is the “chief elected official” in the case of a council form of government?
Answer 62:

In the case of a council form of government the letter of commitment may be signed by an individual or group that has authority to legally bind the local unit of government.  

Question 63: The cost share for Phase 1 is 10%. Could you explain what the blended cost share is and how it comes into play regarding the FOA? Is it regarding the four main Action areas for Phase 1? In the FOA explanation about blended cost share it talks about the four tasks areas. Task 1, Task 2, Task 3 and Task 4. Do these tasks have anything to do with the four main Action areas for Phase 1?
Answer 63:

Please see Appendix C – Cost Share Information of the FOA document. Cost share will be applied to awards under this Funding Opportunity in a "Dollar for Dollar" fashion, effectively matching Federal funds to Cost Share funds on a proportionate basis throughout the project. Applicants will be required to demonstrate a minimum 10% cost share for Phase 1 and, should DOE choose to move forward with Phase 2 of this effort, a minimum 20% cost share will be required.

The following example shows the math for calculating required cost share for a project with $1,500,000 in Federal funds with two phases requiring different Non-federal cost share percentages:  

Phase             Proposed Federal Share   Required Federal Share %   Non-federal Cost Share %

Phase 1           $1,000,000                                             90%                                        10%

Phase 2           $500,000                                                 80%                                         20%

*Phase 1

$1,000,000 divided by 90% = $1,111,111 (Phase 1 Cost)

Phase 1 Cost minus federal share = Non-federal share

$1,111,111- $1,000,000 = $111,111 (Non-federal share)

*Phase 2

$500,000 divided 80% = $625,000 (Phase 2 Cost)

Phase 2 Cost minus federal share = Non-federal share

$625,000 - $500,000 = $125,000 (Non-federal share)

*Blended Cost Share %

Non-federal share ($236,111) divided by Total Project Cost ($1,736,111) = 13.6% (Non-federal) Federal share ($1,500,000) divided by Total Project Cost ($1,736,111) = 86.4% (Federal)

Question 64: Do all local jurisdictions participating on a team have to complete the Appendix 1 spreadsheet?
Answer 64: It is the lead applicant's responsibility to ensure that a copy of Attachment 1 is completed fully and accurately for each participating jurisdiction, and submitted with the application package.  "Participating jurisdiction" means a jurisdiction that has provided a letter of commitment, including a commitment to contribute cost-share to the project.  Only the population of participating jurisdictions may count toward the 500,000 population eligibility threshold.
Question 65: The FOA is intended for grid-connected systems, not for stand-alone systems. Is the FOA intended only for grid-connected systems with no stand-alone capability? Can we include issues and activities for grid-connected systems that also have batteries?
Answer 65: Applicants may propose activities to improve market conditions for any systems that fall under the category of “grid-connected rooftop PV systems.”  The purpose of this FOA is to significantly accelerate PV deployment, so applicants are encouraged to focus efforts on PV applications that they see as highly scalable in the near term. 
Question 66: What are the requirements for industry participation on the project team (i.e. numbers of solar companies) and what are the requirements for industry verification?
Answer 66:

There are no requirements for industry participation on the project team, though it is encouraged.  The requirements for industry verification are that industry verification letters are included in the application package per the instructions on page 14 of the FOA, and included here for convenience:

“For certain indicators, applicants and awardees must submit verification from solar companies that the information provided with regard to the permitting and interconnection process is in line with what the industry has experienced.  This independent industry verification should be in the form of a letter (see Appendix E) signed by representatives from at least 2 companies in the residential PV business and at least 2 companies in the commercial PV business representing a significant portion of PV sales in the participating jurisdictions.”

The questions in the market assessment (Attachment 1) that require industry verification are marked “Yes” in the industry verification column of the Attachment 1 spreadsheets. 

Question 67: Does the DOE have a preference for the Lead Applicant to be a for-profit/non-profit acting on behalf of state or local governments OR for the Lead Applicant to be a state or local government?
Answer 67: The funding opportunity is designed to support teams in improving market conditions for rooftop PV, with the goal of enabling all teams to achieve a minimum of 800 out of 1000 points by the end of Phase 1, according to the point allocation described on page 13 of the FOA.  DOE encourages applicant teams to self-organize in the manner that will enable the team to achieve the most progress toward the goals of the funding opportunity. 
Question 68: How much time should we allow for DOE to answer questions submitted via the FOA link?
Answer 68: DOE will try to respond to a question within 3 business days, unless a similar question and answer have already been posted on the website.
Question 69: We have mostly municipal councils, each of whom is elected, but with no single ""Chief Elected Officials." In this case, who should sign the letter of commitment?
Answer 69: In the case of a council form of government the letter of commitment may be signed by an individual or group that has authority to legally bind the local unit of government.
Question 70: Does the DOE expect awardees to accomplish changes in net metering and interconnection standards during the one year period of performance of Phase 1?
Answer 70: By the end of Phase 1, awardees are expected to meet or exceed a minimum score of 800 out of 1000 points according to the point allocation described on page 13 of the FOA.  Awardees are expected to focus their Phase 1 efforts in areas that will enable them to achieve that minimum score.  Whether those areas include net metering and interconnection standards will depend on the market conditions for the specific awardee at the beginning of Phase 1.
Question 71: Do educational institutions qualify as lead organizations?
Answer 71:

Yes, non-profit or for-profit entities authorized to act on behalf of a consortia. Please refer to Section III.A., Eligible Applicants, in the FOA.  It is referenced here for your convenience:

A. Eligible Applicants

It is intended to restrict eligibility for this FOA to applicant entities that satisfy the following requirements:

• Located in the United States and
• State or territorial governments; or
• Local governments; or
• Consortia, made up of regional or statewide teams of local governments, large single jurisdictions, or Indian Tribes; or • Non-profit or for-profit entities authorized to act on behalf of a consortia of state and/or local governments, and • The total population represented by eligible entities for this FOA must be 500,000 or greater as defined by the 2010 report of the U.S. Census Bureau.

Question 72: What are the 5 major regions?
Answer 72: The 5 major regions that are relevant for Phase 2 activities are depicted in Figure 2 on page 12 of the FOA.
Question 73: When completing the assessment and having companies verify these results, what if there aren't any companies that have attempted to install PV systems in the jurisdiction and therefore cannot certify these answers?
Answer 73: If there are no existing solar installations within a jurisdiction, the jurisdiction is not required to submit an industry verification letter.
Question 74: Are commitment letters and support letters required to be submitted with the letter of intent?
Answer 74: No, commitment letters and support letters are only required to be submitted with the application.
Question 75: Is it appropriate for our state energy office to be the lead application for phase 1 or is this jumping ahead to what you envisioned for phase 2?
Answer 75:

State Energy Offices make appropriate lead applicants.  Please refer to Section III.A., Eligible Applicants, in the FOA.  It is referenced here for your convenience:

A. Eligible Applicants

It is intended to restrict eligibility for this FOA to applicant entities that satisfy the following requirements:

• Located in the United States and
• State or territorial governments; or
• Local governments; or
• Consortia, made up of regional or statewide teams of local governments, large single jurisdictions, or Indian Tribes; or • Non-profit or for-profit entities authorized to act on behalf of a consortia of state and/or local governments, and • The total population represented by eligible entities for this FOA must be 500,000 or greater as defined by the 2010 report of the U.S. Census Bureau.

Question 76: Funding has been allocated for phase 1, however there is reference that the proposal should cover phase 1 and 2. Should the budget and grant request cover phase 1 & 2 even though phase 2 is conditional and funding hasn't been allocated yet?
Answer 76: The budget should cover both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the project.  Please refer to Criterion 3 under Section V.A.1. of the FOA: Thoroughness and viability of plan and proposed budget to achieve Phase 2 goals, benchmarked against the level of effort proposed in Phase 1including identification of all necessary stakeholders and strategies for engaging those stakeholders.
Question 77: Can you illustrate what you mean by jurisdictions? For example, our county has only 270,000 people - would we reach beyond our region to the entire state for partnerships?
Answer 77: The total population represented by an applicant team must be 500,000 or greater as defined by the 2010 report of the U.S. Census Bureau.  DOE encourages entities to partner as necessary to meet the eligibility requirements.
Question 78: Please give us an idea of the spending in Phase II...we are interested in using funds for financing options...is this feasible?
Answer 78:

As stated on page 11 of the FOA, Phase 2 activities should focus on:

STATE/REGIONAL STANDARDIZATION OF PERMITTING PROCESSES:  Achieve implementation of common process framework for PV permitting throughout the awardee’s state, and more broadly if possible.

Question 79: Can you give us an idea of what you think the jurisdictions will spend $500K on in phase I?"
Answer 79: By the end of Phase 1, awardees are expected to meet or exceed a minimum score of 800 out of 1000 points according to the point allocation described on page 13 of the FOA.  Awardees are expected to focus their Phase 1 efforts in areas that will enable them to achieve that minimum score.  The specific project plan for each applicant will depend on the market conditions the applicant faces at the beginning of Phase 1.
Question 80: Will DOE give points to jurisdictions that have already achieved some of the solar-friendly policy indicators in the score criteria, but still need to make progress in other areas? In other words does this FOA favor proposals from jurisdictions ""with the farthest to go"" or does it also support progressive jurisdictions that want to move their policy framework further ahead?
Answer 80: Please refer to the FOA under Section V.A.1, Merit Review Criteria and Section V.A.2, Other Selection Factors.
Question 81: Where will this presentation be available after the webinar? Is it downloadable at DOE as a pdf or other?
Answer 81: All webinar presentations will be available from www.solar.energy.gov/challenge as a pdf file.
Question 82: What if once we have applied, we discover that state law does not allow a uniform permitting process due to different classifications of municipal jurisdiction (e.g. first class city partnering with unincorporated township)?
Answer 82: DOE recognizes that a variety of factors may limit the degree of process standardization possible in the near term.  DOE encourages applicants and awardees to propose and achieve the maximum level of process standardization feasible and appropriate given their specific circumstances. 
Question 83: If you have a large municipality of multiple jurisdictions and you do not have letters of support from all the jurisdictions, will you be disqualified if your population of participating jurisdictions is more than 500,000?
Answer 83:

Applicants must have a letter from each third party (i.e., a party other than the organization submitting the application) indicating that the entity is supportive of the applicant’s proposal and will engage in activities as appropriate to help the applicant achieve the proposed objectives.  The total population represented by the entities participating on a team must be 500,000 or greater based on the 2010 Census. 

Please note that only the population of local jurisdictions that have committed to contribute cost-share (evidenced by Letters of Commitment) can count toward this 500,000 threshold. 

Question 84: Please clarify how we should differentiate Phase I and II in our proposal: Do we describe a project plan/goals for each phase, but submit a budget only for Phase I?
Answer 84: The application should describe a project plan and goals for each phase.  Additionally, the budget should cover both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the project.  Please refer to Criterion 3 under Section V.A.1. of the FOA: Thoroughness and viability of plan and proposed budget to achieve Phase 2 goals, benchmarked against the level of effort proposed in Phase 1including identification of all necessary stakeholders and strategies for engaging those stakeholders.
Question 85: Would this grant be good to pursue if a county does not have any regulations in place that address PV, but the public utility in that county does have good solar incentives? In this situation the county and city would be the applicant with support from the public utilities.
Answer 85:

Please refer to Section III.A., Eligible Applicants, in the FOA.  It is referenced here for your convenience:

A. Eligible Applicants

It is intended to restrict eligibility for this FOA to applicant entities that satisfy the following requirements:

• Located in the United States and
• State or territorial governments; or
• Local governments; or
• Consortia, made up of regional or statewide teams of local governments, large single jurisdictions, or Indian Tribes; or • Non-profit or for-profit entities authorized to act on behalf of a consortia of state and/or local governments, and • The total population represented by eligible entities for this FOA must be 500,000 or greater as defined by the 2010 report of the U.S. Census Bureau.

Question 86: As the lead applicant on the SunShot grant, is it the lead applicant responsibility to get information from our partners to complete Attachment 1? Or should the documents for Attachment 1 be given to the participating partners to complete and then return to the lead applicant? Also, when you say each jurisdiction, does this mean each partner on the application?
Answer 86: It is the lead applicant's responsibility to ensure that a copy of Attachment 1 is completed fully and accurately for each participating jurisdiction, and submitted with the application package.  "Participating jurisdiction" means a jurisdiction that has provided a letter of commitment, including a commitment to contribute cost-share to the project.  Only the population of participating jurisdictions may count toward the 500,000 population eligibility threshold. 
Question 87: Can you please send these very helpful slides?
Answer 87: All webinar presentations will be available from www.solar.energy.gov/challenge as a pdf file.
Question 88: Are the webinar archived anywhere to be accessed later? I missed the June 29 overview and would like to watch if possible.
Answer 88: All webinar presentations will be available from www.solar.energy.gov/challenge as a pdf file.
Question 89: I attended the Webinar for the RoofTop Challenge and have since then been unable to download the Excel worksheet necessary for the application. It comes out as unrecognizable random character strings. Can you please send me a version? I was hoping that it might have been a problem that would have resolved itself by now.
Answer 89: Attachment 1 can be downloaded from the EERE eXCHANGE website at: http://eere.energy.gov/financing/exchange.  You may try a different internet browser.  You should be able to download the file successfully using Internet Explorer.
Question 90: Recipients may charge to an award resulting from this announcement pre-award costs that were incurred within the ninety (90) calendar day period immediately preceding the effective date of the award, if the costs are allowable in accordance with the applicable Federal cost principles referenced in 10 CFR part 600. Would this include pre-award costs incurred in the 90 days preceding the 8/31/11 proposal submission deadline, and would that include costs associated with preparing the proposal for submission?
Answer 90:

The date that is referred to under this section is the effective date of the award, not the proposal submission deadline.  As stated in the FOA, if the costs in question were incurred more than 90 calendar days immediately preceding the effective date of the award, Recipients must obtain the prior approval of the Contracting Officer. If recipients are State or Local Governments, they may not incur pre-award costs prior to award, without prior approval of the DOE Contracting Officer.

Please reference the applicable Federal cost principles referenced in 10 CFR part 600 for allowable costs.

Also note that pre-award costs are incurred at the applicant’s risk.  DOE is under no obligation to reimburse such costs if for any reason the applicant does not receive an award or if the award is made for a lesser amount than the applicant expected.

Question 91: When reviewing the Sunshot grant applications, will you all be giving any special consideration for applicants that make an effort to include low-income individuals or make diversity part of the planning process?
Answer 91: Applications will be scored based on the Merit Review Criteria and Program Policy Factors listed in the FOA.  Please refer to Section V.A.1, Merit Review Criteria and Section V.A.2, Other Selection Factors.
Question 92: Is there a limit to either the dollar amount or percentage of project funds that may be subcontracted by the primary applicant to a private sector contractor to help carry out the work?
Answer 92:

No, there is no limit to either the dollar amount or percentage of project funds that may be subcontracted by the primary applicant to a private sector contractor. 

The funding opportunity is designed to support teams in improving market conditions for rooftop PV, with the goal of enabling all teams to achieve a minimum of 800 out of 1000 points by the end of Phase 1, according to the point allocation described on page 13 of the FOA.  DOE encourages applicant teams to self-organize in the manner that will enable the team to achieve the most progress toward the goals of the funding opportunity. 

Question 93: Specifically when will today's slides and recording be available?
Answer 93: The slides and transcript from the June 29 webinar are available from www.solar.energy.gov/challenge. The audio will be available by July 11.
Question 94: How soon will this webinar be available to hear again? What is the web address for the recorded webinars?
Answer 94: The slides and transcript from the June 29 webinar are available from www.solar.energy.gov/challenge. The audio will be available by July 11.
Question 95: Are there regional goals for awards?
Answer 95: Please refer to the FOA under Section V.A.1, Merit Review Criteria and Section V.A.2, Other Selection Factors.
Question 96: May one of the entities providing industry verification be made by a member of the team that is applying?
Answer 96: Applicants should make every effort to provide industry verification letters from companies that would not be direct recipients of funding under this FOA (either primary or sub-awardees).  However, if such companies do not exist, industry verification letters may be provided by companies that would receive funding, for the purposes of this application only.
Question 97: I am new to writing and understanding the federal grant applications and documents, etc, so when I start to write the Project Narrative, is it alright to include the following: Organization Mission, History, Overall Objectives, Overall Goals, etc.? Does an applicant have room to include additional information in this section, or should the applicant stick to format by completing only the documents DOE has listed to include in the Project Narrative: i.e the Cover Page, Project Objectives, Merit Review Criteria, Project Timetable, Project Partners, and Bibliography and References?
Answer 97: Please refer to the requirements for the Project Narrative on pages 19-20 of the FOA.  Note that information about organizational mission and history would be appropriate to include in the discussion of Merit Review Criterion 4.
Question 98: Please go into further explanation about the Summary Slide and what you mean by Technology Summary? Do you have a website/link that I could view showing an example of a completed Technology Summary/Slide?
Answer 98:

Please refer to the requirements for the summary slide on page 19 of the FOA, and included here for convenience:

A Project Summary in Power Point format should be provided using the template provided.  All information must fit on a single slide.  The Summary Slide may be released to the public by DOE, in whole or in part, at any time.  Therefore, it is required that the Project Summary must not contain proprietary or confidential business information. Save the Summary Slide as “Control#_ LeadOrganization_Summary.ppt.” Please submit file as a .PPT only (not PPTX or other formats).

 
While the summary slide template refers to a Technology Summary, please consider this slide a "Project Summary" as opposed to a "Technology Summary."  In other words, where the slide template asks for a one paragraph summary of technology, please provide a one paragraph summary of your proposed project.  Where the slide asks for a key picture or chart summarizing technology development, please provide a graphic depicting key activities or anticipated outcomes of your project. Where the slide asks for a quantitative description of technology impact, please provide a description of the expected impact of your project on market conditions for rooftop PV, including quantitative analysis to the extent possible.

Question 99: Is it ok to use the information written in the one page abstract for the Summary for Public Release slide? Does DOE have any samples/links showing an example of a completed Summary for Public Release Slide relating to research and development?
Answer 99:

Please refer to the requirements for the summary slide on page 19 of the FOA, and included here for convenience:

A Project Summary in Power Point format should be provided using the template provided.  All information must fit on a single slide.  The Summary Slide may be released to the public by DOE, in whole or in part, at any time.  Therefore, it is required that the Project Summary must not contain proprietary or confidential business information. Save the Summary Slide as “Control#_ LeadOrganization_Summary.ppt.” Please submit file as a .PPT only (not PPTX or other formats).

 
While the summary slide template refers to a Technology Summary, please consider this slide a "Project Summary" as opposed to a "Technology Summary."  In other words, where the slide template asks for a one paragraph summary of technology, please provide a one paragraph summary of your proposed project.  Where the slide asks for a key picture or chart summarizing technology development, please provide a graphic depicting key activities or anticipated outcomes of your project. Where the slide asks for a quantitative description of technology impact, please provide a description of the expected impact of your project on market conditions for rooftop PV, including quantitative analysis to the extent possible.

Question 99: Does this Challenge address only rooftop PV systems or are ground-mounted systems included?
Answer 99:

 
The Challenge is focused on achieving improvements in market conditions for rooftop PV systems, which represent the majority of residential and commercial-scale installations across the U.S. 

Applications that propose activities to achieve process improvements for market segments other than rooftop PV may be considered favorably compared to those that do not, all other aspects of the applications being equal.  In general, DOE's expectation is that the improvements made to permitting and interconnection processes for rooftop systems will have a positive ripple effect on processes for other market segments, including ground-mounted systems and larger-scale systems.  DOE recognizes that ground-mounted systems represent an important market opportunity, and will continue to monitor development in this market segment and make strategic investments to support market growth.

Question 100: Does the letter from the Chief Elected Official have to specify a cost-share amount or just generally confirm that the jurisdiction will contribute a portion of the total cost share and make personnel available to support the project? Cost share amounts will be included in the summary table as required on page 17 of the FOA.
Answer 100:

As Stated in Section III.B. of the FOA:

Applicants must provide a letter of commitment from the chief elected official of each participating jurisdiction that confirms that the jurisdiction will contribute a portion of the total cost share. 

 Please also refer to Section IV.C.8. of the FOA, provided below for your convenience:

8.    Letters of Commitment – (Mandatory)

Applicants must have a letter from each third party contributing cost share (i.e., a party other than the organization submitting the application) stating that the third party is committed to providing a specific minimum dollar amount of cost share.  All Letters of Commitment must be attached as an Appendix to the Project Narrative File.  Identify the following information for each third party contributing cost share: (1) the name of the organization; (2) the proposed dollar amount to be provided; (3) the amount as a percentage of the total project cost; and (4) the proposed type of cost share – cash, services, or property.  Letters of Commitment from parties participating in the project, exclusive of vendors, who will not be contributing cost share, but will be integral to the success of the project, must be included as part of this Appendix to the Narrative.  Letters of Commitment will not count towards the Project Narrative page limit.

Question 101: Our company has offices in NW West Virginia and Northern Virginia (Southern Region). Would it be possible to partner with a consortium in DC or MD (Northeast Region)?
Answer 101:

Yes, as long as the applicant team meets the eligibility criteria listed in Section III.A. of the FOA, cited here for your convenience:

 It is intended to restrict eligibility for this FOA to applicant entities that satisfy the following requirements:

 •     Located in the United States and

     State or territorial governments; or

     Local governments; or

     Consortia, made up of regional or statewide teams of local governments, large single jurisdictions, or Indian Tribes; or

     Non-profit or for-profit entities authorized to act on behalf of a consortia of state and/or local governments, and 

     The total population represented by eligible entities for this FOA must be 500,000 or greater as defined by the 2010 report of the U.S. Census Bureau.

Question 102: Can a state energy office be the applicant for this grant? It appears that they can but it seems odd that they would need to do a letter of support for themselves.
Answer 102:

A State Energy Office is eligible to apply to this Funding Opportunity. For eligibility criteria, please refer to Section III.A. of the FOA, cited below for your convenience:

 

It is intended to restrict eligibility for this FOA to applicant entities that satisfy the following requirements:

 

     Located in the United States and

     State or territorial governments; or

     Local governments; or

     Consortia, made up of regional or statewide teams of local governments, large single jurisdictions, or Indian Tribes; or

     Non-profit or for-profit entities authorized to act on behalf of a consortia of state and/or local governments, and 

     The total population represented by eligible entities for this FOA must be 500,000 or greater as defined by the 2010 report of the U.S. Census Bureau.

 

Question 104: Is this FOA ONLY for governmental teams? We are a small privately owned company who work with government agencies, and wonder if we can pursue this on our own or if we need to work on a team with a government group. Page 8 : "for local government teams to partner with relevant stakeholders" (paragraph 4) Does this mean this FOA must originate from a governmental group and we would be relevant stakeholders or can it go the other way? Please Advise, asap.
Answer 104:

Please refer to eligibility criteria listed in Section III.A. of the FOA, cited here for your convenience:

 

It is intended to restrict eligibility for this FOA to applicant entities that satisfy the following requirements:

 

     Located in the United States and

     State or territorial governments; or

     Local governments; or

     Consortia, made up of regional or statewide teams of local governments, large single jurisdictions, or Indian Tribes; or

     Non-profit or for-profit entities authorized to act on behalf of a consortia of state and/or local governments, and 

     The total population represented by eligible entities for this FOA must be 500,000 or greater as defined by the 2010 report of the U.S. Census Bureau.

 

Question 105: My question is the duration of the proposal. Phase 1 is for one year, and Phase 2 if it actually occurs would be for up to 2 years. The Announcement seems to imply that the proposal should be written for both phases. Is that correct? The budget limits are only stated for Phase 1; do the same limits ($250,000 to $1,000,000 per year from DOE) apply to Phase 2?
Answer 105:

You are correct, the proposal should be written for both phases.  As stated on Page 11 of the FOA: Applicants must provide a preliminary plan for their potential participation in Phase 2 with the initial application.  Additionally, Section V.A.1. states that the plan for Phase 2 is a merit review criterion:

 Criterion 3: Plan for Increasing Market Maturity (Phase 2) Weight: 20%

*     Identification of specific, aggressive, yet realistic goals for Phase 2, and expected positive impact on solar market development if those goals are achieved.

*     Thoroughness and viability of plan and proposed budget to achieve Phase 2 goals, benchmarked against the level of effort proposed in Phase 1including identification of all necessary stakeholders and strategies for engaging those stakeholders. 

*     The extent to which the application quantifies the impact of the proposed changes in practices and policies identified in bullet one against an established set of practices and policies.

*     Extent to which applicant identifies potential challenges and risks to success, and proposes smart strategies for overcoming obstacles that arise.

Specific budget limits for Phase 2 are not included in this FOA.  However, Section II.B. states:

Subject to availability of appropriated funds, approximately $12.5 million is expected to be available for new awards made under this announcement to support work conducted under Phase 1. Should DOE decide to move forward with Phase 2 of this effort, it is anticipated that an additional $25-30 million will be provided, subject to annual appropriations. The funding will be allocated over a project period of up to three years (the period of performance for Phase 1 is one year; for Phase 2 it is up to two years). A go/no-go decision will be made for each awardee at the end of Phase 1, should DOE choose to move forward with the Phase 2 effort.

Question 106: Please provide a specific step by step explanation of how the market maturity scoring on page 13 will be evaluated. The FOA explains how points will be evaluated for 200 out of the 1,000 possible points (Interconnection Standard = 100, and Net Metering Standard = 100) based on the FTG report by converting FTG letter grades into a Solar Challenge numeric score, but it does not explain how the 800 possible points for other action areas will be evaluated. We understand that each action area has a specific number of maximum points allocated, but the FOA does not explain how the answers in the Market Evaluation (Attachment 1) will translate into a numeric score.
Answer 106:

Each participating jurisdiction will provide responses to the questions in Attachment 1 to the FOA.  Each response is associated with a number of points.  The maximum possible amount of points for the different categories of questions is listed in Table 1 on page 13 of the FOA.  

The FTG (Freeing the Grid) report is the basis for the scoring within the Interconnection Standard and Net Metering Standard categories.  The maximum points attainable within each of these two categories is 100, as listed in Table 1.  Table 2 in the FOA provides a detailed conversion of FTG scores to Challenge scores for the Interconnection Standard and Net Metering categories. 

Question 107: For the answer being provided to the Market Assessment, is this regarding only solar installations that are interconnected? Or does it also include PV installations on residential or commercial properties that are not connected to the utility grid?
Answer 107: Applicants may propose activities to improve market conditions for any systems that fall under the category of "grid-connected rooftop PV systems."  The purpose of this FOA is to significantly accelerate PV deployment, so applicants are encouraged to focus efforts on PV applications that they see as highly scalable in the near term. 
Question 108: In the Market Assessment, when the question is asking for average time and states days, it is assumed that this means business days?
Answer 108: Yes, questions asking for average number of days are always referring to business days.
Question 109: Can I obtain an electronic copy of the webinar PowerPoint slide shows? If so, how?
Answer 109: Yes, the presentation, transcript, and audio are posted online, accessible from www.solar.energy.gov/challenge.
Question 110: For the Model Process question (#16) in Attachment 1, is the answer for "reject" considered at equal value to "unaware"?
Answer 110: Yes, "Unaware/Reject" is a single answer option.
Question 111: How can I join a team and submit an application?
Answer 111: Go to Challenge home page (http://www.solar.energy.gov/challenge) for more information or link directly to the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) for the Rooftop Solar Challenge at https://eere-exchange.energy.gov for details on how to apply. 
Question 112: We were not able to apply for this grant in the required time but want to still collect the information from the townships. Is there a way to get the excel sheet that was explained during this webinar? Also is there a way to find out if there is a group/ team doing this program in our area? Where can we get that information?
Answer 112: Applications are due August 31, 2011, and Letters of Intent are due July 29, 2011. Information on applying to the Challenge (including the Attachment 1 Excel file) can be found at the Challenge home page (http://www.solar.energy.gov/challenge), or you can link directly to the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) and the Attachment 1 Excel file at https://eere-exchange.energy.gov.
Question 113: Is the solar.energy.gov website the same as http://www.eere.energy.gov/solarchallenge/
Answer 113: No, www.solar.energy.gov is the home website for the DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program; http://www.eere.energy.gov/solarchallenge/ is a dedicated webpage for the Rooftop Solar Challenge.
Question 114: For Phase I, does DOE hope to see financing programs designed/developed, or actually implemented?
Answer 114: The FOA is designed to support teams in increasing market maturity such that by the end of Phase 1 the team achieves a minimum score of 800/1000 on the market assessment, and higher if possible.  Applicants should therefore focus their plan on the areas necessary to raise their score to at least the minimum level.  Note that within the Financing Options section of the market assessment, some questions are concerned with enabling legislation or regulation, whereas others are concerned with the existence (i.e. implementation) of actual financing programs.
Question 115: Given that applicants must set a baseline, is there any consideration given to applications that can demonstrate they have already done work to make solar PV installation faster/cheaper/easier?
Answer 115: Please refer to the FOA under Section V.A.1, Merit Review Criteria and Section V.A.2, Other Selection Factors for a description of how applications will be evaluated.
Question 116: I have a question about the Lead Applicant for the FOA. [Name Removed] (non-profit) will be acting as the project director/principal investigator and will be contributing most of the administration of the grant; however, the City of [Name Removed] will be the Lead Applicant and will be joined with several other municipalities (that will sign letter of commitments) and other organizations (that will sign letters of support). The City of [Name Removed] desires [Name Removed] to collect and administer the grant funds and the logistics of the grant/project even though they want to be the Lead Applicant by name/stature on the grant. Can [Name Removed], non-profit submit the LOI and application and if so, can we use our other registration information (EERE eEXCHANGE, DUNS, CCR, FedConnect, etc.) even though we are not the Lead Applicant or does the City of [Name Removed] need to do this since they are the Lead Applicant? Are there other requirements of for the Lead Applicant that we should be aware?
Answer 116:

The Letter of Intent and application must be submitted by the Lead Applicant, in this case, the City.  Please also note that the Principal Investigator must be from the Lead Applicant's entity.  The non-profit would be a sub-recipient as you described.

 

The Lead Applicant should be aware of all requirements in the FOA, including cost share and required submission documents.

 

Question 117: We are currently trying to develop a SunShot team in the state of [Name Removed] but could use some guidance as to what exact requirements exist regarding the Letters of Support outlined in the Financial Assistance Funding Opportunity Announcement. Currently, our office is working with other stakeholders to try and determine the optimum geographical area to focus the SunShot initiative upon in [Name Removed]. The question that has arisen is "Do we need to receive letters of support from every single municipality and/or state entity that exists within this geographical area?" There exists a League of Municipalities in [Name Removed]: would it be sufficient to receive a letter of support from the League alone?
Answer 117:

The lead applicant must provide a letter of commitment from the chief elected official of each jurisdiction contributing cost-share to the project.  It is only those jurisdictions that contribute cost-share and complete a market assessment (Attachment 1) as part of the application that will count toward the 500,000 population eligibility threshold. 

There is no requirement for a lead applicant to provide letters of commitment from all jurisdictions within a certain geographical area.

Question 118: Feed-in Tariffs (FIT) represent a very large opportunity to accelerate access to financing of distributed solar, but there is no category in the market assessment table that allocates points specifically to this option. FIT could fall under the "other" Financing category, but that represent only 20 possible points. Could DOE clarify if FIT programs and policies could score points in areas of the market assessment such as "direct financing", "other financing," or "interconnection process?"
Answer 118:

"If the feed-in-tariff affects the interconnection process, then that would be captured in the responses to the interconnection process questions.  Feed-in-tariffs would not qualify for points under question 4 of the Financing Options tab of Attachment 1 regarding Direct Finance Options.  "Financing program" as referenced in question 4 refers to a mechanism that enables a consumer to spread the cost of a PV system over time.  As stated on the Financing Options tab, the "other" category does not include direct rebate or subsidy programs, which for the purposes of this Challenge, includes feed-in-tariffs and other performance-based incentives. 

The Challenge supports DOE's SunShot Initiative to make solar electricity cost-competitive without subsidies by 2020.  While subsidies and rebates have been instrumental in developing solar markets, the Challenge aims to support market-based structures, programs and policies that will be successful in a non-subsidized environment.  Therefore, points are not awarded for existing or proposed direct incentive or subsidy programs."

Question 119: Is it possible for applicants to figure out their score according to Table 1 on page 13 of the FOA (it doesn't seem like this is the case), or is the scoring calculated by DOE upon submission of the proposal?
Answer 119: Table 1 is provided so that applicants can understand the maximum number of points possible within each of the action areas; it does not enable applicants to calculate their exact score.  For the purposes of Phase 1 applications, applicants do not need to calculate their exact score; they simply need to respond to the questions in the market assessment (Attachment 1).
Question 120: On page 16, the FOA states that eligible applicants include "non-profit or for-profit entities authorized to act on behalf of a consortia of state and/or local governments." I'm wondering what sort of "authorization to act" is required by DOE, or if authorization is conferred by the local government partners submitting letters of commitment along with the application package.
Answer 120:

The lead applicant must submit letters of commitment from the chief elected official of each participating jurisdiction.  These letters of commitment must reflect each's jurisdiction's commitment to contribute cost share and to work according to the proposed workplan.  If a non-profit or for-profit organization as lead applicant submits such letters from participating jurisdictions, the non-profit or for-profit organization is considered "authorized to act on behalf" of those jurisdictions for the purposes of the Challenge.

Question 121: The [Name Removed] is interested in joining a team to apply for the Rooftop Solar Challenge. [Name removed] meets all eligibility criteria, as a “non-profit or for-profit entity authorized to act on behalf of a consortia of state and/or local governments.” But our entity is currently working on the DOE Solar America Communities Outreach Partnership, as a sub. Please confirm our eligibility.
Answer 121:

DOE cannot confirm an applicant's eligibility with limited provided information until DOE has reviewed the application during the normal review process. Please refer to Section III.A Eligible Applicants for specific eligibility requirements.

Generally, no entities that were involved in assisting DOE in crafting the Rooftop Challenge FOA are eligible to apply.  Further, no applicant may utilize any DOE funding received under other DOE arrangements (including funding received as a current provider of technical assistance for a Solar America Cities recipient) to work on any Rooftop Challenge applications. 

As long as the proposed applicant can meet the above requirements, their participation as a contractor or a subcontractor for a recipient under DOE's Solar America Cities program does not prevent the applicant from being eligible to apply under this FOA.

Question 122: Can someone talk about how you obtain the points for each category? Is there a certain requirement that you need to meet or is it a spectrum? For example, can you get 70 out of 100 points for a particular category?
Answer 122:

By the end of Phase 1, awardees are expected to meet or exceed a minimum score of 800 out of 1000 points, according to the point allocation described on page 13 of the FOA, in order to be eligible for Phase 2.  Awardees are expected to focus their Phase 1 efforts in areas that will enable them to achieve that minimum score.  It is possible that a jurisdiction will score a 70 out of 100 points for a given category.  Table 1 of the FOA is provided so that applicants can understand the maximum number of points possible within each of the action areas; it does not enable applicants to calculate their exact score. 

For the purposes of Phase 1 applications, applicants do not need to calculate their exact score; they simply need to respond to the questions in the market assessment (Attachment 1). For the initial award selection, DOE will evaluate all applications based on the merit review criteria listed on pages 28-29 of the FOA.

DOE will share the more detailed point allocation for the market assessment with applicants that are awarded Phase 1 funding.

Question 123: If the state energy office is the lead applicant for the SunShot application, would the entire population of the state qualify toward the size of the jurisdiction?
Answer 123: The lead applicant must provide a letter of commitment from the chief elected official of each jurisdiction contributing cost-share to the project.  It is only those jurisdictions that contribute cost-share and complete a market assessment (Attachment 1) as part of the application that will count toward the 500,000 population eligibility threshold.  So if the lead applicant is the state energy office, the entire population of the state would count toward the eligibility threshold only if every authority-having jurisdiction in the state provides a letter of commitment as part of the application package.
Question 124: Our company wishes to take the lead to submit this grant. We are a for-profit business acting on behalf of a consortia of State or Local governments and want to make sure that our DUNS number is the one to be used to submit the proposal--that it does not have to be a DUNS number from State or Local Governments.
Answer 124: You are correct, you should use the DUNS number of the lead applicant when you submit your application.
Question 126: Should the one-page abstract be included as text in the letter, or as an attachment to the letter?
Answer 126:

The one-page abstract is part of the Letter of Intent.  As stated in the FOA:

The Letter of Intent must include the following information:

1.    Lead Applicant and names of all anticipated partners

2.    Title of the project

3.    One page abstract describing the project

4.    Estimated total DOE funding request

5.    The name of the Project Director/Principal Investigator(s)

Question 127: Should the one-page abstract describe Phase 1 and Phase 2 activities, or just Phase 1?
Answer 127:

The abstract should describe the entire project, which consists of both Phase 1 and Phase 2 activities.

Question 128: For estimated total DOE funding request, is this for just Phase 1, or should the total DOE request include Phase 2 also?
Answer 128: The budget (which includes both DOE funding and Recipient cost share) should cover both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the project.  Please refer to Criterion 3 under Section V.A.1. of the FOA: Thoroughness and viability of plan and proposed budget to achieve Phase 2 goals, benchmarked against the level of effort proposed in Phase 1including identification of all necessary stakeholders and strategies for engaging those stakeholders.
Question 129: Please confirm if sub-recipients applying as part of a team need a separate EERE account, even though the team members (and the lead applicant) will be applying together under a single EERE account?
Answer 129: Only the lead applicant needs to register through EERE eXCHANGE.
Question 130: It appears that sub-awardees at all tiers must obtain a DUNS number and provide the DUNS number before the sub-award can be issued. Given that it can take up to 30 days to secure a DUNS number, do the sub-awardees need a DUNS number prior to the application due date or only after the award notification (approximately, October 2011)?
Answer 130: The Registration Requirements in the FOA are only required by the lead applicant in order to submit an application. If selected for award, sub-awardees will be required to obtain a DUNS number at that time.
Question 131: Will sub-recipients be paid directly by the U.S. DOE or through the lead applicant?
Answer 131: Subrecipients are paid through the lead applicant.
Question 133: Does the Disclosure of Lobbying form need to be filled out by all partners or only the applicant?
Answer 133: The SF-LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities Form only needs to be filled out by the lead applicant, if applicable.
Question 134: Must the total populations of each and all of the "participating communities" that submit Letters of Commitment be 500,000 and greater? i.e., is the intent of this grant program for large cities rather than suburbia or rural U.S.?
Answer 134:

134.  As stated in Section III.A., Eligible Applicants, the total population represented by eligible entities for this FOA must be 500,000 or greater as defined by the 2010 report of the U.S. Census Bureau.

The population represented by a given applicant is calculated as the sum of the populations of local jurisdictions that submit letters of commitment to participate on the team. 

Question 135: Related to the Project Narrative File requirement, and section entitled “Merit Review Criteria Discussion”, the FOA specifies “The section should be formatted to address each of the merit review criteria and sub-criteria listed in SECTION V – APPLICATION REVIEW INFORMATION A.2.” Does this imply that this section should cover all five criteria listed under section A.1, including: • Criterion 1 Understanding Market Environment • Criterion 2 Plan for Increasing Market Maturity Phase 1 • Criterion 3: Plan for Increasing Market Maturity Phase 2 • Criterion 4: Qualifications, Resources and Capabilities • Criterion 5: Management Plan We wanted to clarify since the Project Narrative File, Merit Review Criteria Discussion specifics referring to “A.2” (not A.1), which appears to be related to “Other Selection Factors”.
Answer 135:

The reference (Section V - Application Review Information A.2.) in the Project Narrative File requirement, Merit Review Criteria Discussion section is incorrect.  Instead, it should reference Section V - Application Review Information A.1. 

Question 136: Attachment 1 "interconnection" tab question 8 asks "if the utility tracks the number of days each application takes to process". If the answer is "no" then does the DOE require a response to questions 9-11 with required industry verification submittals?
Answer 136:

Yes, responses to questions 9-11 on the Interconnection Process tab are required, along with industry verification, regardless of the answer to Question 8. 

The response to Question 8 is a simple ""Yes"" or ""No"" based on whether there is a mechanism in place to track processing time for every application.  For Question 9, an average estimate must be provided for the application process time, regardless of the whether there is a formal tracking mechanism in place.  Same for Question 10 - an average estimate must be provided for the time between inspection request and inspection, regardless of whether there is a formal mechanism in place to track the actual time this step takes for every project.

For additional information related to these questions, view the Permitting and Interconnection webinar materials located at: http://www.solar.energy.gov/challenge

Question 137: Can a Council of Governments (COG) sign on to the challenge instead of the individual cities it represents? The COG Board making the commitment is made up of elected officials from each of the jurisdictions.
Answer 137:

The letters of commitment used to determine whether the applicant has met the requisite 500,000 population threshold must be signed by individuals or groups that have the authority to legally bind the local unit of government.  If the COG board has the authority to commit jurisdictions to provide cost share and work according to the proposed workplan then the COG board may be the signatory to the letter of commitment. 

Also note, a team composed of multiple jurisdictions must submit one copy of Attachment 1 for each participating jurisdiction.  The Lead Applicant is responsible for ensuring that the application package includes one copy of Attachment 1 for each jurisdiction and that answers are based on the most accurate information available.  Files should be named according to the naming convention on p.25 of the FOA. 

Question 138: We are in the process of preparing our application and letter of intent for the Challenge. Several counties in our region are interested in partnering with us in this effort. If cities within the counties send letters of support (not commitment), do their populations count as a part of the total so long as the counties give letters of commitment (with cost share)? We appreciate any clarification you can bring. Thank you for your time.
Answer 138:

For the purposes of applying to this funding opportunity, a county must subtract from its reported population the population of any jurisdictions within the county that do not provide letters of commitment to participate on the applicant team.

The exception to this rule is if a county is the authority-having-jurisdiction with regard to solar permitting for jurisdictions within the county.  In this case, a county may include the population of those jurisdictions in its reported population without providing letters of commitment from those jurisdictions. 

Question 139: Is there a page limit for the letter?
Answer 139:

The Letter of Intent should be no more than two pages, and must include the following information:

 1.    Lead Applicant and names of all anticipated partners

2.    Title of the project

3.    One page abstract describing the project

4.    Estimated total DOE funding request

5.    The name of the Project Director/Principal Investigator(s)

Question 140: Is there a letter of support example that the DOE prefers?
Answer 140:

There is no template for the letter of support.  As stated in Section IV.C.:

 Letters of Support – (Mandatory)

Applicants must have a letter from each third party (i.e., a party other than the organization submitting the application) indicating that the entity is supportive of the applicant’s proposal and will engage in activities as appropriate to help the applicant achieve the proposed objectives.  All Letters of Support must be attached as an Appendix to the Project Narrative File.  Letters of Support will not count towards the Project Narrative page limit.

 As long as the letter of support contains the necessary information, it will be acceptable to DOE.

 

Question 141: Does the electronically submitted letter of Intent for the SunShot Initiative: Rooftop Solar Challenge to Induce Market Transformation need a signature? If a signature is required, whom is required to sign the AOR, the CEO, the head elected official (Mayor), or other?
Answer 141:

No, DOE does not require a signature on the Letter of Intent.

Question 142: Are 501(c)(6) organizations eligible to be sub recipients under this agreement (given the Disclosure of Lobbying Activities form)?
Answer 142:

501(c)(6) entities are eligible to apply; however, they must adhere to the lobbying restrictions and disclosures described in the FOA.

Question 142: I was wondering if the opportunity listed as SunShot Initiative: Rooftop Solar Challenge to Induce Market Transformation was reoccurring?
Answer 142:

 

This FOA is not reoccurring; however, the due date for letters of intent and applications under this FOA has not expired.  Letters of Intent are due by 07/29/2011, 5:00pm Eastern Time and applications are due by 08/31/2011, 5:00pm Eastern Time.  For additional information, please refer to the FOA document at EERE eXCHANGE at http://eere.energy.gov/financing/exchange. 

Question 143: We are trying to submit our Letter of Intent for DE-FOA-0000549. When we hit submit it gives error messages saying a 424 must be submitted. We did not see this in the instructions for the Letter of Intent. Amendment 001 extended the due date until 07/29/2011, 5:00 PM Eastern Time. Is it possible that the amendment date is not in the system and hence, it is assuming we are trying to submit the application instead of a Letter of Intent? Is there a Letter of Intent box that needs to be checked?
Answer 143:

 You are correct, a SF 424 is not required for submission of the Letter of Intent.  Please submit this question to the EERE eXCHANGE helpdesk at EERE-ExchangeSupport@hq.doe.gov.

 

Question 144: Do you have a set of definitions and parameters for the TRL for DE-FOA-0000549: Rooftop Solar Challenge to Induce Market Transformation ? I was not able to find it on the application site. It is required for the applicant to list starting and estimated end TRL for the proposed application in the LOI.
Answer 144:

The TRL section is not applicable to this FOA and has been removed from the application process.

 

 

Question 145: 1: For Question 9 in the SF-424, does only the Lead Applicant need to be listed as the “Type of Applicant” or should the sub-recipients be included as well? If so, we have 3 sub-recipients and there are only two additional spots. Is it okay to only include 2 out of the 3 sub-recipients? 2: Given the quote in Appendix B: “Applicants must ensure that Protected Personally Identifiable Information (PII) is not included in the following documents: Project Abstract, Project Narrative, Biographical Sketches, Budget or Budget Justification,” in the resume file are we allowed to include employment history?
Answer 145:

1: Only the lead applicant should be listed in the SF-424 under Question 9.

2: As stated in Appendix B, employment information that is not PII even when associated with a name; resumes; present and past position titles and occupational series; etc. are examples of Public PII that Applicants may include in the Project Abstract, Project Narrative, Biographical Sketches, Budget or Budget Justification. The section is referenced here for your convenience:  

Listed below are examples of Public PII that Applicants may include in the files listed above to be evaluated by the Merit Review Committee:

1.    Phone numbers (work, home, cell)

2.    Street addresses (work and personal)

3.    Email addresses (work and personal)

4.    Digital pictures

5.    Medical information included in a health or safety report

6.    Employment information that is not PII even when associated with a name

7.    Resumes, unless they include a Social Security Number

8.    Present and past position titles and occupational series

9.    Present and past grades

10.   Present and past annual salary rates (including performance awards or bonuses, incentive awards, merit pay amount, Meritorious or Distinguished Executive Ranks, and allowances and differentials)

11.   Present and past duty stations and organization of assignment (includes room and phone numbers, organization designations, work email address, or other identifying information regarding buildings, room numbers, or places of employment)

12.   Position descriptions, identification of job elements, and those performance standards (but not actual performance appraisals) that the release of which would not interfere with law enforcement programs or severely inhibit agency effectiveness

13.   Security clearances held

14.   Written biographies (e.g. to be used in a program describing a speaker)

15.   Academic credentials

16.   Schools attended

17.   Major or area of study

18.   Personal information stored by individuals about themselves on their assigned workstation or laptop unless it contains a Social Security Number

Applicants should include in their resume submissions, the information included in Section IV.C.5., referenced below:

5.    Resume File (Mandatory)

Provide a resume for each key person proposed, including subawardees and consultants if they meet the definition of key person.  A key person is any individual who contributes in a substantive, measurable way to the execution of the project.  Save all resumes in a single file named “Control#_ LeadOrganization_Resumes.PDF.” 

The compiled resume file does not have a page limitation; however, the biographical information for each individual resume must not exceed 2 pages when printed on 8.5” by 11” paper with 1 inch margins (top, bottom, left, and right), single spaced, with font not smaller than 11 point and should include the following information, if applicable:

Education and Training:  Undergraduate, graduate and postdoctoral training; provide institution, major/area, degree and year.

Professional Experience:  Beginning with the current position list, in chronological order, professional/academic positions with a brief description.

Publications:  Provide a list of up to 10 publications most closely related to the proposed project.  For each publication, identify the names of all authors (in the same sequence in which they appear in the publication), the article title, book or journal title, volume number, page numbers, year of publication, and website address, if available electronically. 

Patents, copyrights and software systems developed may be provided in addition to, or substituted for, publications.

Synergistic Activities:  List no more than 5 professional and scholarly activities related to the effort proposed.

     Of the key personnel identified in this file, indicate the Principal Investigator(s) (PI). 

     For Multiple Principal Investigators:   

The applicant, whether a single organization or team/partnership/consortium, must indicate if the project will include multiple PIs.  The decision to use multiple PIs for a project is the sole responsibility of the applicant.  If multiple PIs will be designated, the application must identify the Contact PI/Project Coordinator and provide a “Coordination and Management Plan” that describes the organization structure of the project as it pertains to the designation of multiple PIs.  This plan should, at a minimum, include:

     Process for making decisions on scientific/technical direction;

     Publications;

     Intellectual property issues;

     Communication plans;

     Procedures for resolving conflicts; and

     PIs’ roles and administrative, technical and scientific responsibilities for the project

Question 146: We understand that DOE National laboratories cannot apply for these grants. However, can an applicant utilize subject matter experts from National Laboratories. Can these experts receive salary from this grant program?
Answer 146:

As stated in Section III.C. of the FOA, DOE/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Federal Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) and non-DOE FFRDC’s, are not eligible to apply.  Therefore, they may not be paid with grant funds through this Funding Opportunity Announcement.

 

Question 147: For cities within counties that are committed to cost sharing, do their populations count even if they themselves do not provide letters of commitment but only letters of support?
Answer 147:

For the purposes of applying to this funding opportunity, a county must subtract from its reported population the population of any jurisdictions within the county that do not provide letters of commitment to participate on the applicant team.

The exception to this rule is if a county is the authority-having-jurisdiction with regard to solar permitting for jurisdictions within the county.  In this case, a county may include the population of those jurisdictions in its reported population without providing letters of commitment from those jurisdictions.

 

Question 148: For virtual net metering - would the generation/supply be expected to come from a rooftop installation?
Answer 148:

For the purposes of the Financing Options section of the Market Assessment, the answer options for the community solar questions are not limited to rooftop installations.

Question 149: Under lease, who owns electricity produced?
Answer 149:

Questions #1 and #2 in the Financing Options section of the Market Assessment cover two different types of leasing options for a solar system. Question #1 refers to third party ownership leases whereby the customer enters into a service contract with a lessor (the owner) of a PV system and agrees to make fixed monthly lease payments (regardless of system generation) over time. The customer does not purchase power from a third party but simply leases equipment and receives the power generated by that equipment. Question #2 refers to utility rooftop solar programs, whereby the utility owns the electricity produced by a system while the building owner receives lease payments for hosting the system (i.e. providing the roof space).

Question 150: Under leases and PPAs, what is the relationship to the utility? how ipacted by net metering agreements?
Answer 150:

Typically, under a third-party PPA model, a developer builds and owns a PV system on a customer’s property and sells the power back to the customer. Under a solar lease, the customer does not purchase power from a third party but simply leases equipment and receives the power generated by that equipment.

 In both cases the relationship with the utility can vary depending on the details of the third party ownership lease or PPA and the state and/or PUC rules and regulations. For example, depending on the state, qualifying facilities for net metering may or may not include customer-generators that do not own their PV system.

Question 151: I am interested in the S.M.U.D. Solar Share model of community solar. In the financing action area, community solar is one of the issues mentioned in the FOA. Virtual net metering is also mentioned. Are financial efforts to support community solar an exception to the preference for "rooftop" solar installations?
Answer 151:

For the purposes of the Financing Options section of the Market Assessment, the answer options for the community solar questions are not limited to rooftop installations.

Question 152: Where can I receive guidance and/or funding in order to start distributing solar panels?
Answer 152:

You may search for grant opportunities through the EERE eXCHANGE website at http://eere.energy.gov/financing/exchange <http://eere.energy.gov/financing/exchange>  or through grants.gov (click on Find Grant Opportunities on the left hand side of the screen).

Question 153: I am trying to submit a letter of intent to participate in the SunShot Initiative: Rooftop Solar Challenge to Induce Market Transformation program but I cannot locate an address to send the letter to, can you please advise?
Answer 153:

The Letter of Intent deadline has now passed.  All Letter of Intent submissions must have been made via the EERE eXCHANGE at http://eere.energy.gov/financing/exchange. To gain access to the EERE eXCHANGE system, the applicant must first register and create an account on the main EERE eXCHANGE site.  This account will then allow the user to register for any open EERE FOAs that are currently in eXCHANGE.  A “User Guide” for the EERE eXCHANGE can be found on the EERE website http://eere.energy.gov/financing/exchange/Manuals.aspx after logging in to the system.  Applicants will receive an automated response when the Letter of Intent or Application is received; this will serve as a confirmation of EERE receipt – please do not reply to the automated response.

Question 154: My question concerns filling out the net metering tab in the Excel market assessment. Our state does not have a net metering program, however, we have a dual metering system that pays a premium above the retail rate for solar generation. Customers sign up for this program through the utility in their jurisdiction. Could the net metering questions be answered using this program?
Answer 154: 154.  For the purposes of completing the market assessment in Attachment 1 of the application, the net metering tab should not be completed with information that is not directly related to a net metering program. However, as indicated in the instructions tab of Attachment 1, you may use the Data/Sources/Notes column to include information on an alternative approach that your jurisdiction has taken with respect to the subject of any question in Attachment 1.
Question 155: I have read the Attachment I instructions stating that scores for Net Metering and Interconnection standards for states and utilities are in Appendix A of the "Freeing the Grid 2010" report. I have read and printed out those reports but in entering the pertinent information for the state in the worksheets there are multiple instances where the scoring does not match and where the sum of the scores does not reflect the total score given in the report. For example for California under the Net Metering Tab Question 1, the score in the report is 3.5 but the options in the spreadsheet are 1,2,3,4,5 ; there is no option for half points. The sum of points given for Q 1-10 on the Interconnection tab for California when added up add up to 3 not 11.5 as stated in the report. I am concerned because there may be a publicly owned utility in our team and we will need to score the jurisdiction in that utility's territory using these same spreadsheets, how can you reconcile the disparities between the spreadsheets and the report? I have read the report twice and gone through the webinar slides and have not found how to do so, is there somewhere you can point me to for reference?
Answer 155:

155.  The Network for New Energy Choices (NNEC) Freeing the Grid (2010) report has a few anomalies, such as CA’s score for system capacity, which are the result of NNEC using discretion to account for specific factors associated with each state that do not fit neatly into the answer options. As noted in the Webinar 3 presentation (Slide 9) and transcript, the Freeing the Grid total score for each state under Interconnection includes an additional 7.5 points to normalize grading with Net Metering. Note that these points are not added to the Freeing the Grid Net Metering scores. DOE will account for the 7.5 points for Interconnection when comparing the market assessment to the Freeing the Grid score.

If the answer options in the market assessment do not apply to your situation, you should mark the closest answer provided in the multiple choice options, and add any clarifying comments in the Data Sources/Notes column.

Question 156: How does the DOE view the development of an SREC market in a given region for the purposes of this grant? Is developing an SREC market for a region an activity that would be considered as phase 1 points under this grant?
Answer 156:

156.  The Challenge aims to support market-based structures, programs and policies that will be successful in a non-subsidized environment.  Applicants may describe approaches to facilitating PV financing that are not specifically addressed in other questions in the Question #7 (“Other”) area of the Financing Options tab of Attachment 1. 

Note that for the purposes of Phase 1 applications, applicants do not need to calculate their exact score; they simply need to respond to the questions in the market assessment (Attachment 1).  For the initial award selection, DOE will evaluate all applications based on the merit review criteria listed on pages 28-29 of the FOA.

Question 157: We are applying as a State Energy Office and thus comply with the population requirement of over 500,000. As the SEO we will commit the 10% in cost share and we expect to gain additional cost share from each of our major utilities and key NGO partners. The Commissioner of our office will act as the legal authority to sign for the state. Thus can the SEO act for the entire state as one jurisdiction "to provide cost share and work according to the proposed work plan" as well as submit one Attachment 1 for the entire state? If the answer is no, would we need letters and attachment 1 or each county (there are 14 but they have no governing authority) or each utility (there are 20)?
Answer 157: 157.  If the state is the authority-having jurisdiction with respect to solar permitting then the state energy office as lead applicant is not required to provide letters of commitment or market assessments from individual jurisdictions. However, any jurisdiction that asserts its own authority regarding permitting, such as requiring electrical inspections, will need to sign a letter of commitment and complete the market assessment in order for that jurisdiction’s population to be included toward the total applicant team population.
Question 160: One of the sub-recipients in our consortia is a non-profit regional association of cities. This non-profit will be a sub-recipient under this proposal and would administer services to the cities participating under this FOA according to our proposal work plan. Each of the cities would submit letters of commitment and commit to a specific dollar amount of cost-share and commit to carry out actives to achieve the goals of the proposal scope of work. The cities themselves would not submit sub-recipient budgets to DOE under this proposal. Please confirm if cities may participate in this way.
Answer 160:

 

If the non-profit entity is a subrecipient under the proposal, the non-profit entity must submit a budget and budget justification (please see section IV.C.10 and IV.C.11 of the FOA for specific requirements of the sub-recipient budget and budget justification).  As described, the Cities would also be considered subrecipients (to the non-profit), and need to submit letters of commitment and budget justifications as they are committing cost-share and performing activities to achieve the goals of the proposal. 

Question 161: Does the LOI require an official Signature on the LOI document before submitting?
Answer 161:

No the LOI does not require an official Signature on the LOI document before submitting.  Please reference Question 141 on the Exchange website at https://eere-exchange.energy.gov/FAQ.aspx?FoaId=d7fc28a9-cd94-4548-b0ea-4713432c90fd

Question 162: We have submitted our LOI and would like to know how many LOIs were received for this FOA (00549). Can you provide us with a count of the number of valid LOIs that were received?
Answer 162:

No, we will ot be releasing information on total number of LOIs received under this FOA.

 

Question 163: The FOA indicates that the mandatory cost share may be in cash, services or property. Does the DOE have a required method for assigning a value to services and property? Also, does the Letter of Commitment have to include the valuation method used for the services and/or property to be provided?
Answer 163:

For specific information regarding the valuation of services and property, please reference the administrative Cost Share requirements in 10 CFR 600.123, 10 CFR 600.224 and 10 CFR 600.313 by entity type. Recipient contributions of services and property shall also be established in accordance with the applicable cost principles by entity type, 2 CFR 225, 2 CFR 230, 2 CFR 220, and FAR 31.2.  A general rule of thumb is to ask the question, "What is the fair market value?" 

 

Letters of Commitment are required to state the dollar value of the provided cash, services and/or property.  While it is helpful to provide the valuation method in the letter, this is not required.  If the valuation method is not included in the letter, and the applicant is selected for negotiation of an award, the applicant will be asked to provide the valuation method during the negotiation process.

 

Question 164: In DE-FOA-0000549, Section IV, application and submission information are listed. Item 2 is a one-page Summary for Public Release. Is this the same as the SOPO form ("Statement of Project Objectives") which is among the downloadable Required Application Documents? I note that the SOPO is not referred to by name on the list of documents needed for the application in the "Content and Form of Application" part of Section IV. It does, however, appear in the downloadable documents.
Answer 164:

No, the one-page Summary for Public Release is not the same as the SOPO.  You are correct, there is not a template for the one-page summary. 

 If the applicant is selected for negotiation of an award, the information in the one-page Summary for Public Release will potentially be used in a press release, whereas the SOPO will become part of the legal award document, (description of the work the applicant agrees to perform under the award).

The SOPO is called out by name in item 13 of the "Content and Form of Application" in Section IV of the FOA.

Question 165: I am unable to find an Attachment 1 document that resembles the “Market Assessment” pictured in PowerPoint 1 slide 7. Instead, the Attachment 1 document I was able to locate contains 4 worksheets: Financing Options, Planning-Zoning, NNEC – Net Metering, and NNEC – Interconnection. None of these worksheets contains the information described in PowerPoint 1 slide 7. Please advise whether this is correct.
Answer 165:

Attachment 1 has seven worksheets, not four.  Please scroll to the "Permitting Process" tab of Attachment 1, which corresponds to Slide 7 of Webinar 1.

 

 

Question 166: The NOFA’s instructions for completing the SF 424 state – NOTE: the dates and dollar amounts on the SF 424 are for the complete project period and not just the first year, first phase, or other subset of the project period. Based on these instructions are applicants to use a start and end date that reflects the 12 month period of performance of Phase I or are applicants to use a start and end date that reflect the three year period of performance for Phase 1 & Phase 2 of the SunShot Initiative?
Answer 166:

Please use period of performance dates that reflect the combined project period for both Phase 1 and Phase 2.

Question 167: Can a national lab participate in our proposal scope of work as a supporter by making in-kind contributions of subject matter expertise as long as they do not receive funds under the grant?
Answer 167:

Cost share funds are subject to the same restrictions as DOE share, therefore, national labs may neither receive funds under this FOA, nor provide cost share.

Question 168: We are working on the Sunshot application and are learning A LOT about our individual municipalities. We've been asking and monitoring the FAQs and we are helping the munis new to this to prepare their Attachment 1s. We initially thought that we would be working with the 5 counties, but since they don't have jurisdiction over the munis we are trying to work with as many munis as practical but there are quite a few of them. I was wondering as we struggle with pulling together the application and assuring we are going to get meaningful support, do you all foresee any sort of extension for the final application deadline?
Answer 168:

At this point in time, DOE does not anticipate extending the final application submission deadline.

 

Question 169: When can applicants expect to hear from DOE on whether they have been awarded the grant or not?
Answer 169:

DOE expects notify applicants selected for negotiation of an award by the end of October 2011.  This notice of selection is not an authorization to begin performance.  As stated in Section VI.A of the FOA, organizations whose applications have not been selected will be advised as promptly as possible.  This notice will explain why the application was not selected. 

Question 170: When should applicants expect to start work on the grant, if selected to receive funding?
Answer 170:

Applicants who are selected for negotiation of an award can expect the award to be finalized by mid-December 2011, however, the award date is contingent upon the applicant's responsiveness during the negotiation process.  Non-responsiveness during negotiation will delay the award date.  Once the award is signed, applicants may begin work.

 

Question 171: Does the project timetable need to reflect activities associated with the 12-month period of performance of Phase I only or does the project timetable need to reflect activities associated with the three year period of performance for Phase I & Phase II of the SunShot Initiative?
Answer 171:

The project timetable should reflect activities for the combined project period for both Phase 1 and Phase 2, with greater emphasis on Phase 1, as that is the focus of the current funding opportunity.

Question 172: We are ~10 local jurisdictions all served by one local utility. We are clear that we need independent industry verification for the permitting section of the market assessment by 2 residential and 2 commercial installers active in each local jurisdiction. We are assuming that for the interconnection process section of the market assessment that we need independent industry verification by 2 residential and 2 commercial installers active in the utility service territory. Correct?
Answer 172:

Correct. Industry verification for questions in the interconnection process section must be provided by companies active in the service area of the primary load serving utility for each jurisdiction participating in the application.

Question 173: The FOA states an minimum/maximum DOE share for Phase I, but there is no guidance for anticipated award sizes for Phase 2. If applicants are to present project budgets requesting funds for Phase 1 and Phase 2, how should applicants proceed in structuring their proposed three-year project budgets?
Answer 173:

The budget should cover both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the project.  Please refer to Criterion 3 under Section V.A.1. of the FOA: Thoroughness and viability of plan and proposed budget to achieve Phase 2 goals, benchmarked against the level of effort proposed in Phase 1 including identification of all necessary stakeholders and strategies for engaging those stakeholders.  

As stated in Section II.B. of the FOA: Subject to availability of appropriated funds, approximately $12.5 million is expected to be available for new awards made under this announcement to support work conducted under Phase 1. Should DOE decide to move forward with Phase 2 of this effort, it is anticipated that an additional $25-30 million will be provided, subject to annual appropriations.

As stated in Section III.B. of the FOA: Applicants will be required to demonstrate a minimum 10% cost share for Phase 1 and, should DOE choose to move forward with Phase 2 of this effort, a minimum 20% cost share will be required. Cost share may consist of cash or in-kind contributions from the lead applicant or partners. Also note that the required minimum applicant cost share percentage is not based on the Federal share but, rather, is based on the Total Project Cost.

Question 174: For the Industry Verification Letter suggested format, it says [Insert DOE POC and address]. Who is the point of contact for the letter to be addressed to and what is the DOE address to insert into the letter? For letters of support, should these be addressed to DOE or to the lead organization applicant?
Answer 174:

174.  The DOE Point of Contact for Industry Verification Letters and Letters of Support is:
 

Todd Wilson

Contracting Officer,

US Department of Energy Golden Field Office

1617 Cole Blvd. Golden, CO  80401

 However, all Industry Verification Letters and Letters of Support that are directed to DOE and follow the requirements detailed in Section IV.C. and Appendix E of the FOA document will be accepted. 

 

Question 175: For the market assessment, if the primary power provider has a different process for systems of 100kW or less than it does for systems of greater than 100kW (which fall into the Qualified Facilities and are treated the same as mega watt projects), should the responses to the Interconnection Process tab be based on the process for the systems under 100 kW? The top of the spreadsheet defines residential as 10 kW or less and commercial at 100 kW or less, but what if the power provider doesn’t have a breakdown similar to this. Thank you!
Answer 175: 175.  Responses to questions on the Interconnection Process tab of the market assessment should be differentiated by the utility’s categorization of residential (or smaller-scale rooftop installations) versus commercial (or larger-scale rooftop installations).  If your utility differentiates the interconnection process based on whether the installation is above or below 100 kW, use the process defined for installations equal to or less than 100 kW for checking responses under the residential column of the market assessment, and the utility’s process for installations above 100 kW for responses under the commercial column. You may include comments in the Data Sources/Notes column to explain or justify answers.
Question 177: Section II B. (page 17) states: “Should DOE decide to move forward with Phase 2 of this effort, it is anticipated that an additional $25-30 million will be provided, subject to annual appropriations.” Is the anticipated $25 -$30 million the total available for all regions (in aggregate)? Or is that the allocated per region? Secondly, “research and development’ is mentioned in several places, including page 21, 1st sentence of # 2 Summary for Public Release. Can you elaborate on your expectations regarding research and development.
Answer 177:

The anticipated $25 to $30 million mentioned in Section II.B. is the total Phase 2 funding anticipated to be available for all recipients who proceed to Phase 2 (in aggregate).

 

The "research and development" mentioned in Section IV.C.2, "Summary for Public Release" section of the FOA should read "project".  The Summary for Public Release should provide a concise statement of the proposed project.

Question 178: In the “Permitting Process” tab of Attachment 1, should Question 18’s “Specific Time” range read “5-8 hours” for the third option?
Answer 178:

18

What is the typical window of time given to the installer for final onsite inspection?

Multiple Choice

Yes

Specific Time

 

Specific Time

2 hrs

 

2 hrs

3-4 hrs

 

3-4 hrs

5-8 hrs

 

3-8 hrs

> 1 day

 

> 1 day

 

Yes, in the “Permitting Process” tab of Attachment 1, Question 18’s “Specific Time” range should read “5-8 hours” for the third option. 

Question 179: The FOA does not specify to what address Letters of Support should be directed. We have collected Letters of Support addressed to the Primary Applicant, to be consistent with Letters of Commitment (also addressed to the Primary Applicant as per Question #9). The recent answer to question #174 suggests that Letters of Support should be addressed to the DOE. Will the DOE accept letters of support addressed to the Primary Applicant? Please confirm that the Primary Applicant’s Letter of Commitment (from Chief Elected Official) should be addressed to the DOE. Please also confirm that cost share partners' Letters of Commitment should be addressed to the Primary Applicant.
Answer 179: Yes, the DOE will accept Letters of Support addressed to the Primary Applicant.  The Letter of Commitment from the Chief Elected Official may be addressed to the DOE.  Third party Letters of Commitment should be addressed to the Primary Applicant; however, the DOE will also accept Letters of Commitment addressed to the DOE. 
Question 180: Is the “SunShot Initiative: Rooftop Solar Challenge to Induce Market Transformation” grant for people too?
Answer 180:

As stated in Section III.A. of the FOA, applicants must satisfy the following requirements:

•                    Located in the United States and
•                    State or territorial governments; or
•                    Local governments; or
•                    Consortia, made up of regional or statewide teams of local governments, large single jurisdictions, or Indian Tribes; or
•                    Non-profit or for-profit entities authorized to act on behalf of a consortia of state and/or local governments, and 
•                    The total population represented by eligible entities for this FOA must be 500,000 or greater as defined by the 2010 report of the U.S. Census Bureau .

Unfortunately, the DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program (SETP) does not currently provide direct funds to homeowners/ consumers for solar applications at this time. However, the Federal Government does provide a tax credit for installing qualified solar water heating and photovoltaic systems. More information on the Residential Solar Tax Credit can be found at: http://www.dsireusa.org/library/includes/incentive2.cfm?Incentive_Code=US37F&State=Federal¤tpageid=1&ee=0&re=1

Question 181: I understand that for the subject funding opportunity, local governments are not allowed to claim previously incurred costs as match, unless this is approved by the DOE Contracting Officer. Our County is partnering with some of its cities to submit an application for this grant opportunity. The County and these cities have already contributed a large amount of work to developing an alternative financing program for solar energy as well as working to streamline the solar PV permit process. Therefore, I would like to request that the County and these cities be allowed to include the staff time already spent on these efforts as part of the required 10% cost share requirement.
Answer 181:

Unfortunately, costs that are incurred prior to an applicant being selected for negotiations leading to an award may not be counted towards the cost share requirement.

 

Furthermore, if recipients are State or Local Governments, they may not incur pre-award costs prior to award, without prior approval of the DOE Contracting Officer. DOE will not approve any pre-award costs before an applicant has been selected.

 

Please see Section IV.G. of the Funding Opportunity for specific information regarding pre-award costs. 

 

Question 182: How many letters of intent were received for this solicitation notice?
Answer 182:

 

As stated in Question #162 on the EERE Exchange website, DOE will not be releasing information on the number of Letters of Intent received.

 

Question 183: The [Name Removed] has filed a letter of intent for the Rooftop Solar Market Transformation grant. We would like to know if our state with a population of 1,052,567 can be considered as one single jurisdiction. [Name Removed] is the only county with a population of more than 500,000. Concerning letters of commitment from the "chief elected official" of each participating jurisdiction, [Name Removed] has no elected officials for each county. We only have city mayors, town council managers, and a Governor.
Answer 183:

 The lead applicant must provide a letter of commitment from the chief elected official of each jurisdiction contributing cost-share to the project.  It is only those jurisdictions that contribute cost-share and complete a market assessment (Attachment 1) as part of the application that will count toward the 500,000 population eligibility threshold.  The entire population of the state would count toward the eligibility threshold only if every authority-having jurisdiction in the state provides a letter of commitment as part of the application package. If the state is the authority-having jurisdiction with regard to solar permitting then the state as lead applicant is not required to provide letters of commitment of market assessments from individual jurisdictions.

 

Mayors are elected officials. In the case of a council form of government the letter of commitment may be signed by an individual or group that has authority to legally bind the local unit of government.

Question 184: This goes along with Question 34 under the FAQs. I noticed on the FOA for the SunShot initiative that Cost-Sharing for Phase I may consist of cash or in-kind contributions. For our jurisdiction, one of the partners would like to hire someone full-time and devote their salary to part of the in-kind contribution for blended cost-sharing. Is this an acceptable way of contributing to the total cost-share?
Answer 184:

Personnel labor is acceptable cost share. However, in-kind contributions represent non-cash transactions, in the case of personnel hours it would represent volunteer labor hours. If the individual is paid salary by the organization, it would be considered cash cost share.

Question 185: I am working on completing the budget portion for funding opportunity DE-FOA-0000549. In reading the directions for the SF 424 and SF 424A, it states that I will need funding amounts for the complete project and budget cost for each of the 3 years. I have gone through the FOA several times and only see the award size of phase 1, year 1. I see that Phase 2 , year 2-3, says $25-30 million would be provided, but no Maximum amount per awardees. Am I to assume an amount to complete the 3 year budget?
Answer 185:

Yes, please assume a value for Phase 2, benchmarked against the level of effort proposed in Phase 1.  The Phase 2 budget will be reviewed on the basis of its thoroughness and viability to achieve Phase 2 goals.  Please refer to Criterion 3 under Section V.A.1 of the FOA. 

Question 186: I want to confirm what I think is an error in the Market Assessment Attachment 1 document on the NNEC Net Metering tab. For #4 “Metering Provisions” , should the first scoring option read “2.5” and not “2.0” for the choice (No meter change required — customer-sited generator uses existing meter)? Additionally, #5 – Time-of-use. There is no score for this category in the Freeing the Grid report – or none that I could find. I can consult the individual utilities regarding this standard, is this appropriate or is there a special resource you would like us to use? There are multiple instances where the report gives scores with half-points for the state, the options only include whole number responses. I am choosing the lower of the two options i.e. for a score of 2.5 I have chosen the box with 2.0 rather than a score of 3.0 and made a note of the score – is this sufficient for DOE?
Answer 186:

The scoring options are correct for #4 on the NNEC Net Metering tab in Attachment 1. The options reflect those provided in the Freeing the Grid (2010) report. The Freeing the Grid report consolidates the “Metering Provisions” options with the “Metering Provisions Under Time-of-Use” options, whereas these two topics are separated in questions #4 and #5 on the Net Metering tab of Attachment 1.

 

The Network for New Energy Choices (NNEC) Freeing the Grid (2010) report has a few anomalies, which are the result of NNEC using discretion to account for specific factors associated with each state that do not fit neatly into the answer options.  If the answer options in the market assessment do not apply to your situation, you should mark the closest answer provided in the multiple choice options, and add any clarifying comments in the Data Sources/Notes column.

 

Question 187: We submitted an LOI for the SunShot FOA. Should we expect to receive an invitation to submit the full application and if so, when should we expect to receive it? ….Or should everyone who submitted presume that they will be able to submit a full application. We’ve put in a tremendous amount of work to gather this information and would like to ascertain that we are permitted to submit the full application before progressing further. In addition, when do you think the application will be open as we would like to start submitting information online?
Answer 187:

The Letters of Intent that have been invited to submit a full application have now been indicated in the Exchange system.  Please log in to your account and proceed to the full application to begin entering information online. 

 

Question 188: The FOA states that applicants must provide a letter of commitment from the chief elected official of each participating jurisdiction that confirms that the jurisdiction will contribute a portion of the total cost share. By this, is DOE referring to the 10% cost-share for Phase 1 which actually has funding allocated? or does the jurisdiction need to specify monetary commitments for Phase 1 and 2 ( total cost share of 10% and 20% respectively)? All mention's of cost-share in the Q&A speak to the 10% for Phase I so I would really appreciate some clarification, thank you!
Answer 188:

 

All participating jurisdictions (those jurisdictions that count toward the 500,000 population eligibility threshold) must commit Phase 1 cost-share, but are not required to commit Phase 2 cost-share. Please note the Cost Sharing requirements in Section III.B. of the Funding Opportunity.  

Question 189: A Letter of Commitment is required from the chief elected official of each participating jurisdiction confirming contribution of cost-share and personnel. A Letter of Support is required from the State Energy Office and each primary utility serving the jurisdictions. Is it correct that the chief elected official of each jurisdiction does NOT have to ALSO provide a Letter of Support?
Answer 189:

That is correct, the chief elected official of each jurisdiction does NOT have to ALSO provide a Letter of Support.  The chief elected official need only provide a Letter of Commitment.

Question 190: Question 13 on the Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 asks for the “Competition Identification Number” and “Title”, how does this number differ from the “Application Identifier” in question 4 and/or from the “Funding Opportunity Number” and “Title” in question 12? And how or where do I find the Competition Identification Number?
Answer 190:

Please leave Question 13 on the SF-424 Application for Financial Assistance blank.

Question 191: In Phase 2 of the project, are follow-up activities relating to the three core action areas of Phase 1 allowable (i.e. Interconnection & Net Metering, Finance Options, and Planning & Zoning) OR must Phase 2 project activities exclusively fall under "State/Regional Standardization of Permitting Processes"?
Answer 191:

For Phase 2, applicants should propose a budget and plan focused on the following (as stated on page 11 of the FOA): “STATE/REGIONAL STANDARDIZATION OF PERMITTING PROCESSES:  Achieve implementation of common process framework for PV permitting throughout the awardee’s state, and more broadly if possible.”

 

Question 192: Hurricane Irene is forecast to strengthen into a major hurricane and come close to the coast of Southeast Florida later this week. Although we hope that the projected path shifts away from [name removed], a full activation is scheduled to begin on Wednesday. We are in the process of finalizing our SunShot Rooftop Challenge application and plan to submit it shortly. However, should the worst come to pass and [name removed] suffers significant damage, could we be granted an extension to the August 31st deadline?
Answer 192:

For now, please continue working on your application with the intent of submitting it by the current deadline of August 31st.  If the hurricane does in fact cause significant damage, we will revisit the issue of an extension at that time. 

Question 193: The FOA and DOE website submission screen does not appear to indicate where to attached/upload industry verification letters as part of this application. Please advise how/where to include industry verification letters as part of this application submission.
Answer 193:

A section for Industry Verification Letters has been added to the upload screen in Exchange. 

Question 194: In Appendix D – Budget Justification, there are example tables provided for each cost section (Personnel, Travel, etc.). Is there a template already created for these, or are we expected to recreate each of these tables so we ensure we have all the information in place? Also, if in our consortium of local government, each local government will be a sub-recipient, they only have to complete a separate SF-424 and budget justification if they are receiving $100,000 or greater, correct?
Answer 194:

No, there is not a template for the Budget Justification.  Applicants are encouraged to present the information in their own excel document.

Yes, only subrecipients receiving $100,000 or greater should submit a separate SF-424 and budget justification.

Question 195: I received a notice that Amendment 004 had been added but can find no explanation of what it changed. Please explain.
Answer 195:

The most recent amendment for DE-FOA-0000549 Rooftop Solar Challenge is Amendment 002.  The notice you received may have been for a different Funding Opportunity Announcement. 

Question 196: If a proposal includes implementation of a proprietary, licensed software that was developed outside of the grant, is the applicant assured of patent and copyright protections?
Answer 196:

Yes, the applicant is assured of patent and copyright protections for any proprietary licensed software developed outside the grant.  However, per 10 CFR 600.234, the DOE "reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, for Federal Government purposes:

(a) The copyright in any work developed under a grant, subgrant, or contract under a grant or subgrant; and

(b) Any rights of copyright to which a grantee, subgrantee or a contractor purchases ownership with grant support." 

Question 197: For the subject grant opportunity, is it possible to submit an application as the lead applicant for one program and to be a commitment partner on a separate application?
Answer 197:

 

Yes, it is possible to be the lead applicant on one application, and a commitment partner on a separate application.  Please ensure that if both proposals were selected, you would have sufficient funding to meet both cost share commitments.

Question 198: For the subject grant opportunity, if you have changed the name of your project since you submitted your Letter of Intent, is it okay to use a new name in the final grant application, or do they have to be the same?
Answer 198:

 Yes, it is acceptable to change the name of the project for the final grant application.

Question 199: We are attempting to upload our SunShot application documents on the EERE-Exchange application site and are running into several restrictions/questions: A. We have multiple subrecipients, but on the application site only one subrecipient SF424A and Budget Justification file is permitted for upload. How do we upload two separate subrecipient file sets? B. We have fringe and indirect rate agreements supporting the SF424A documents. How do we upload these supporting documents? C. The FOA specifies that Letters of Commitment and Letters of Support be attached to the Project Narrative as appendices. However, the application site allows separate document uploads for Letters of Commitment and Letters of Support. Should Letters of Commitment and Letters of Support be uploaded separate from the Project Narrative or as part of the Project Narrative file? If separate, what naming convention should be used for the Letters of Support file and Letters of Commitment file? D. What naming convention should be used for the Industry Verification Letters? E. Does the US DOE require a “Certifications and Assurances” document to support the prime recipient SF424 document?
Answer 199:

A & B:      An option to upload additional files has been added to the upload screen in Exchange.  You may upload multiple subrecipient documentation as well as rate agreements there.

C:    Please use the separately provided document uploads for Letters of Commitment and Letters of Support.  Use the following naming conventions: "Control#_ LeadOrganization_CommitmentLetters" or "Control#_ LeadOrganization_ SupportLetters", as appropriate.

D:    The following naming convention should be used for the Industry Verification Letters:  "Control#_ LeadOrganization_IndustryLetters".

E.    The Certifications and Assurances are incorporated by reference in Question 21 of the SF-424 Application.  The full document can be found at http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/CERTSASSURANCESSF424.pdf.  The authorized representative's signature on the SF-424 will constitute agreement to the certifications and assurances found in the document above.

Question 200: Please confirm that the verification letters from solar companies are to be submitted at the end of Phase I and not with the grant submission. They are not listed as a mandatory document.
Answer 200:

No, the Industry Verification Letters must be submitted with the grant application.

Question 201: The Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 and the Disclosure of Lobbying Activities document require a signature from a authorized representative of the applicant organization. Since these documents can be filled out on the computer can the signature be a digital signature or would we have to print out the documents, sign them, and then scan them back into a PDF? Thank you.
Answer 201:

It is preferable to have an ink signature on these forms (print, sign, scan).  However, if you have digital signature software, that is also acceptable. Please ensure the digital signature uploaded correctly and is legible before submitting.  Simply leaving the signature line blank and uploading the file will not constitute a digital signature.

Question 201: To rephrase question 175, if a power provider has the one process for smaller projects (defined as residential under 10kW and commercial under 100kW), but larger projects have a different process (defined as any project greater than 100kW), does the utility still treat the residential column as projects less than 100kW and commercial column as projects greater than 100kW? Secondly, what if the utility only has a process for projects less than 100kW (defined as residential under 10kW and commercial under 100kW)? In this case, all projects would be considered small projects since they do not have a capacity to add large projects (any project over 100 kW). In this case, the answers for the residential column and commercial column would be the same since the process is identical.
Answer 201:

If your utility differentiates the interconnection process based on whether the installation is above or below 100 kW, use the process defined for installations equal to or less than 100 kW for checking responses under the residential column of the market assessment, and the utility’s process for installations above 100 kW for responses under the commercial column.

If there is no capacity to add projects larger than 100 kW, and there is only one process for projects under 100 kW, then base answers in the residential and commercial response columns on the same process. If the issue is not that capacity cannot be added, but rather a lack of an established process for projects over 100 kW, then base commercial responses on averages and estimates of typical 100+ kW projects.

You may include comments in the Data Sources/Notes column to explain or justify answers.

Question 202: Concerning the definition of jurisdictions, my town inspector made several good points as below: "In our case, the building and mechanical codes are state wide. A mechanical permit is required for the installation and a building permit may be required depending on the loads that are applied to the roof structure." "The electric code is also state wide and any wiring will require a permit and a licensed electrician." "If the installation is on State property it would be permitted through the [state] Building Commissioner's Office. Any other property in town we would issue the permits." Although our towns and cities issue their own solar permits, they are required to follow the same state wide codes. In this case, can our state be considered as a sole jurisdiction?
Answer 202:

If the state is the authority-having jurisdiction (AHJ) with regard to solar permitting then the state as lead applicant is not required to provide letters of commitment or market assessments from participating individual jurisdictions. However, any jurisdiction that asserts its own authority regarding permitting, will need to sign a letter of commitment and complete the market assessment in order for that jurisdiction’s population to be included toward the total applicant team population.

 

Question 202: We are having some confusion about whether our rooftop PV project will be eligible for the SunShot Initiative. It meets all of the requirements, but may be as large as a 925 megawatt installation because the rooftop we own is 5 acres in size. Is a less than 300 kilowatt system a requirement, or just a general guideline? Also, how do you obtain prior approval from the contracting officer for pre-award costs?
Answer 202:

It is not the intent of this FOA to fund solar installation projects.  Rather, this FOA seeks to fund projects that improve the policies, processes and standards that currently hinder solar installations.  Please refer to the "Phase 1 Action Areas" described in Section I of the FOA:

         PERMITTING AND INTERCONNECTION PROCESSES: Develop and implement a transparent, consistent, and expedient permitting and interconnection process for residential (less than approximately 10kW) and small commercial (less than approximately 300kW) rooftop PV systems, throughout all participating jurisdictions.

         NET METERING AND INTERCONNECTION STANDARDS: Improve interconnection and net metering standards, as evaluated by the Network for New Energy Choices grading scheme, for the primary load-serving utility in each participating jurisdiction.

         FINANCING OPTIONS: Increase distributed PV market activity in models other than self-financed ownership by enabling direct financing options, community solar programs, and/or utility-owned distributed generation and resolving legal issues around third party ownership models.

         PLANNING AND ZONING: Remove siting restrictions and incorporate favorable provisions in state and local codes and land use policies in every participating jurisdiction to maximize PV siting options.

Upon selection, recipients must obtain the prior approval of the Contracting Officer for any pre-award costs that are for periods greater than a 90 day calendar period preceding the receipt of the Assistance Agreement signed by the Contracting Officer. Approval for pre-award costs greater than this 90 day period can be requested from the Contracting Officer if an applicant is selected for negotiations leading to award.  The earliest pre-award cost date is the date of the selection, which will likely be by the end of October 2011.

If recipients are State or Local Governments, they may not incur pre-award costs prior to award, without prior approval of the DOE Contracting Officer. 

Question 203: I am interested in learning more about the RFP that was uploaded to GeoRestore titled: Solar energy RFP in the United States - The objective of this announcement for a Rooftop Solar Challenge is to achieve measurable improvements in market conditions for rooftop photovoltaic across the United States, with an emphasis on streamlined and standardized permitting and interconnection processes. DOE anticipates providing up to $12.5M to up to 25 awardees to accomplish the goals of this funding opportunity. Letter of Intent submission deadline is July 29, 2011. Full application submission deadline is August 31, 2011. Contact solarchallenge@go.doe.gov Do you have contact information for the contractors that were awarded the bids? Do you also have information regarding the size of the projects?
Answer 203:

 Award recipients will likely not be selected until October 2011.  DOE will not release specific contact information, however, a public announcement of selected applicants will likely be made at the time of selection.

Question 204: I was looking for any updated / amended information regarding the Sunshot Initiative, particularly regarding the rapidly approaching deadline that has been listed as August 31, 2011.
Answer 204:

The most updated version of the FOA is Amendment 002, which is posted on the Exchange website at https://eere-exchange.energy.gov.  For any additional updates / clarifications on this FOA, please read the Questions & Answers posted at: https://eere-exchange.energy.gov/FAQ.aspx?FoaId=d7fc28a9-cd94-4548-b0ea-4713432c90fd

Question 205: I am ready to work on the budget justification and can only find a word document (GO-PF20a). It states on the FOA that it needs to be an Excel document. Where can I find this?
Answer 205:

As stated in Question 194, there is not a template for the Budget Justification.  Applicants are encouraged to present the information in their own excel document.

Question 206: The northeast region is in the direct path of Hurricane Irene. We might lose power for an extended period of time during this event. If this weather related event adversely impacts our ability to complete the proposal, will DOE provide a reasonable extension to submit applications?
Answer 206:

For now, please continue working on your application with the intent of submitting it by the current deadline of August 31st.  If you have experienced significant power outages and other obstacles to completing the application due to the hurricane, please submit documentation of the problem and we will consider extensions on a case by case basis.

 

Question 207: It is my understanding that the team is scored according to the lowest performing jurisdiction. If a project team consisting of multiple municipalities is awarded a grant, and one of the municipalities later decides to withdraw from the project, will the project team be allowed to continue or replace this municipality without penalty? That is, will the municipality that withdrew be considered in the scoring at the end of Phase 1?
Answer 207:

ANSWER: Eligibility for this Funding Opportunity is restricted to entities with a population of 500,000 or greater as defined by the 2010 report of the U.S. Census Bureau. If an applicant is awarded a grant, and one of the municipalities later decides to withdraw from the project and reduces the project below the population minimum criteria, the project team will need to replace this municipality in order to maintain eligibility for funding. If an entity no longer meets eligibility criteria at any time during an award, DOE reserves the right to discontinue funding the award.

Question 208: We currently do not have a fringe benefit rate agreement. Where can I find the agreement to attach to my application?
Answer 208:

If you do not have a currently approved Federal Rate Agreement, please apply your organizations actual fringe rates, or forecast these rates if need be. Appropriate and approved rates will be negotiated if you are selected for award.

Question 209: I was informed since we use actual fringe rates per employee that we do not need to attach a fringe benefit rate agreement, is this correct? Due to the fact that this is more accurate than a rate assessed against all employees.
Answer 209:

If you do not have a Federal Rate Agreement for fringe costs, please apply your organizations actual fringe rates. Appropriate and approved rates will be negotiated if you are selected for award. You may detail the components of the fringe costs in your budget justification (e.g., health insurance - $400 per person, etc.)

 

Question 210: I’ve read all the FQA’s relative to inquiries on Attachment 1 submittals and as I understand it if the Applicant is working with multiple jurisdictions the Applicant must submit 1 copy of Attachment 1 for each jurisdictions and in the filename format as per the FOA page 25. I want to make sure that I thoroughly understand the submittal process for this requirement so I’m going to ask my question differently. If we’re working with 25 jurisdictions then we would submit one copy of Attachment 1 for each jurisdiction, i.e. 25 Attachment 1s – correct? Please respond with a simple yes you are correct or no you must submit 1 copy of attachment 1 that include all jurisdictions. Hopefully, I am correct because constructing the workbook with 25 different jurisdictions will become an extremely large workbook which may crash the system during submittal.
Answer 210:

Yes, you are correct, you may submit 25 separate Attachment 1s, one per jurisdiction.  Please upload the files in the "Additional Files" section of the Exchange website's document upload screen.

Question 212: I know that it is less than 24 hours until submittal and all questions must be submitted 3 days prior however I’m in the middle of the Upload and Submit step and need an answer ASAP! I have multiple sub-recipient Budget Justifications and sub-recipicient SF-424A as well as multiple Attachment 1 spreadsheets. However, I do not see the “Additional Files” button on the “Upload and Submit” Tab. What happened to it? Do you have to upload ALL required files before this feature appears? HELP!!!
Answer 212:

This problem has been fixed, and the Additional Files upload option is now available.  Please note that the application deadline has been extended to 9/9/2011 at 5:00 PM Eastern Time. 

Question 213: HELP: We were just informed that the primary load bearing utility refuses to sign a letter of support for our innovative program with a vague objection of not sufficient time to evaluate the proposal. This is surprising since we have the state energy office, 4 large local governments & 2 national nonprofits & industry collaborating together all with strong support on our steering committee. Will applications be considered equally (or at all?) without a letter of support from the primary utility?
Answer 213:

Applicants must provide a letter of support from the primary load-serving electric utility for each participating jurisdiction. As listed in Section IV.C of the FOA, the letters of support are required documents to be included in the application submission. DOE reserves the right to deem applications non-responsive if these requirements are not met. However, consideration may be given to incomplete applications if the absent material does not significantly affect the integrity of the proposal.

Please note the Funding Opportunity closing date has been extended to 09/09/2011. This may allow sufficient time for the utility to review your proposal. 

Question 214: I glad to see the DOE granted an extension – thank you! Could you please clarify how we should enter the Federal and Non-Federal costs on the Funds and Costs Tab. Should we only be entering the Federal Share and Non-Federal Share for Phase 1? Or should we include Phase 2 funding as well (Fed and Non-Fed)?
Answer 214:

Please enter the Federal Share and Non-Federal Share for both Phase 1 and Phase 2.

 

Question 215: What documents should we submit for the budget in Phase 2? SF424A line 16 has our estimated request for Phase 2 year one and year two. Do we need those costs broken down in more detail, if so how should we do that?
Answer 215:

Both Phase 1 and Phase 2 costs should be included in the Budget Justification file.  Please see section IV.C.7 of the FOA for more information on the Budget Justification.

Question 216: Hello, my name is [Name Removed] and I am a homeowner. I am real interested in converting my home from using electricity to using solar energy. Is there a grant that I could possibly apply for and if so could you please email me information on the different types of grants that I may qualify for.
Answer 216: You may search for grant opportunities through the EERE eXCHANGE website at http://eere.energy.gov/financing/exchange or through grants.gov (click on Find Grant Opportunities on the left hand side of the screen).
Question 217: Who should apply for this funding? Are you looking primarily at cities? Would a rural county have much of a chance at being awarded funding?
Answer 217:

Please refer to Section III.A., Eligible Applicants, in the FOA.  It is referenced here for your convenience:

A. Eligible Applicants

It is intended to restrict eligibility for this FOA to applicant entities that satisfy the following requirements:

• Located in the United States and
• State or territorial governments; or
• Local governments; or
• Consortia, made up of regional or statewide teams of local governments, large single jurisdictions, or Indian Tribes; or
• Non-profit or for-profit entities authorized to act on behalf of a consortia of state and/or local governments, and 
• The total population represented by eligible entities for this FOA must be 500,000 or greater as defined by the 2010 report of the U.S. Census Bureau.

Question 218: Please note that the formula in cell AL97 of worksheets Budget1A, Budget2A, Budget3A, Budget4A and Budget5A is erroneous.
Answer 218: Please note that the SF424R&R is not a required application document for this particular FOA.  Please refer to Section IV.C., Content and Form of Application, for all required application documents.
Question 219: During Phase 1, can the implementation of financing options include use of granted funds for setting up a loan fund, revolving loan fund, and/or loan loss reserves?
Answer 219:

It is not the intent of this Funding Opportunity to utilize funding to make loans, fund revolving loan programs or fund loan loss reserves.  However, recipients may use award funds for the administrative costs of creating such programs. As described in "Phase 1 Action Areas" in Section I of the FOA, Phase 1 funds in the "Financing Options" category should be used to create the policy and process framework, resolve legal issues, and otherwise promote financing models other than self-financed ownership.

Question 220: ***** Will there be an extension to the application deadline? ***********
Answer 220:

Yes, the application deadline is extended to 9/9/2011 at 5:00 PM Eastern Time.  Please refer to Amendment 003 of the FOA.

 

 

Question 221: I learned that the Funding opportunity number “DE-FOA-0000549” is currently available for applying the grant. My question here is how can I apply this grant for my company (Solar Generation Company)? Please let me know as soon as possible.
Answer 221:

Unfortunately, only applicants who submitted a letter of intent by 7/29/2011 are eligible to apply for this FOA.  Please visit www.Grants.gov to search for other funding opportunities.

Question 222: How or will we be penalized if we can't get a second verification industry verification letter for one of our three participating jurisdictions? The reason that only one verification will be submitted is because the solar market in this mid-size city (~20,000 pop.) is relatively small and dominated by one local solar installation firm. Despite our best efforts, we are unable to locate an additional installer to verify the Market Evaluation for this jurisdiction but feel confident that the data provide is 100% accurate. Ultimately, we want to include the jurisdiction b/c its smaller solar market size is representative of so many communities across the state . Partnering with this type of community with the support the Rooftop Solar Challenge to Induce Market Transformation is essential to provide us the information and experience to achieve our objectives of state uniformity standards.
Answer 222:

If there are no additional existing solar installations within your jurisdiction, the jurisdiction is not required to submit any additional industry verification letters.

Question 223: I am inquiring about the DOE SunShot Initiative. Are there funds available and if there are, how do we apply? Sollega designs, manufacturers and sells solar racking systems for commercial flat roof application. We are a 100% US based manufacturer. Our InstaRack system is made from HDPE plastic. We are working to reduce the labor and cost associated with mounting solar panels. We have been in business for 2 years. We are a privately owned company.
Answer 223:

As stated in Question # 221 on the Exchange website, only applicants who submitted a letter of intent by 7/29/2011 are eligible to apply for this FOA.  Please visit www.Grants.gov to search for other funding opportunities.

Question 224: How should the industry verification letters from the solar companies be submitted? Can they be attached as an Appendix to the Project Narrative?
Answer 224:

No, please use the separately provided document upload for Industry Verification Letters (the last section on the upload screen in Exchange).